Welcome to MathOverflow

Question

13

6

Dear All,

It is well-known that a group is finite iff the number of its subgroups is finite. Is there any similar result for rings and subrings ?? (Clearly we have to distinguish two cases:

rings have identity and subrings have the same identity.
rings and subrings in general.

flag	asked Dec 28 at 8:16 chatish 2,203●4●20

1

There is a third case, namely rings have to have identities but subrings don't necessarily share them. – Qiaochu Yuan Dec 28 at 9:07

Aaron Meyerowitz · Accepted Answer · 2012-12-28 16:05:12Z UTC

This article says that an associative ring with a finite number of subrings is finite.

As pointed out below, the result does not hold for rings with a unit as witnessed by $ \mathbb{Z}$ which has no proper subrings. Also, $ \mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ has two subrings including itself and $ \mathbb{Z}[1/6]$ has four. This shows that there is an infinite ring with $2^k$ subrings. What other examples are there which are commutative integral domains? I don't immediately see any. I think this is a ring with $3$ proper subrings: $ \mathbb{Z}[x]$ where $x^3=0\ne x^2$ and $7x=0.$ Of course $7$ can be replaced by any other prime.

On the number of subrings

Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

1 Answer

You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.