Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question is a follow up to: Model for the (infinity,1)-category of (homotopy-)limit preserving functors.

Warm-up Question: Given a simplicial model category $M$, what model category models the $(\infty, 1)$-category of presheaves of spaces on the $(\infty,1)$-category associated to $M$?

I'm skeptical that the projective/injective model structures on simplicial presheaves on $M$ achieve this goal because they don't seem to use the weak equivalences of $M$ at all. (Although now that I think about maybe SSet-enriched functors "see" the weak equivalences in $M$.)

I'll use $N^{hc}(M^{cf})$ to denote the homotopy-coherent nerve of the simplicial subcategory spanned by the fibrant-cofibrant objects, ie the $(\infty,1)$-category associated to $M$.

Question: Given a simplicial model category $M$ and a fixed diagram category $D$, what model category models the $(\infty,1)$-category of functors from $N^{hc}(M^{cf})$ to Spaces which preserve homotopy limits indexed by $D$?

I was hoping the answer would look something like the following. Denote by Fun(M,SSet) the model category which answers the warm-up question, and by S the collection of natural transformations {F(hlim X) ---> hlim FX } where S ranges over $F:M \to \textrm{Spaces}, X: D \to M$. Then the model category of D-shaped homotopy limit preserving functors from $M$ to Spaces is modeled by the (right?) Bousfield localization of Fun(M,SSet) by S.

If you do answer the question the way I hoped, please say something mildly conciliatory about the fact that S seems too big.

share|improve this question
    
Oh this isn't right: the maps F(hlimX) ---> hlim FX aren't maps of functors. That's embarrassing. –  Joey Hirsh Feb 19 '13 at 23:02

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The $(\infty,1)$-category of presheaves on any small $(\infty,1)$-category $C$ is presented by the model structure of simplicial presheaves on any simplicial category which incarnates $C$. So if $M$ is small, then simplicial presheaves on the simplicial category $M^{cf}$ would do it, or on the hammock localization of $M$, or any other weakly equivalent simplicial category.

If $M$ is not small, then you can pass to a higher universe in which it is. I'm a little doubtful that there is a good model category which presents presheaves on a large domain that take small values, although you might be interested in this paper.

For the second question, I think you want the left Bousfield localization, but other than that your idea is correct (once you deal with size issues as above, so that $S$ is small).

share|improve this answer
1  
Can you say a little more about passing to larger universes with regard to model categories? This is not a precise question, but when it comes to model categories I worry that there are problems with passing to larger universes that I can't see, like maybe something to do with the small object argument. I guess what I'm asking for is a math-statement like "For a given universe U, and a simplicial model U-category M, there is a universe U' s.t U \subset U' and Fun_{U-SSet}(M, U-SSet) is a simplicial model U'-category." Is that true? –  Joey Hirsh Jan 8 '13 at 16:10
    
...and by model category let's say I want functorial factorizations. –  Joey Hirsh Jan 8 '13 at 16:22
1  
Your statement is true (or, at least, follows from the axiom of universes) if you meant Fun_{U-SSet}(M, U'-SSet), if we take U' sufficiently large that M is U'-small. There's no way you're going to get a U'-complete category by taking functors into a category (like U-SSet) that's only U-complete. –  Mike Shulman Jan 9 '13 at 9:25
    
Great. Thanks Mike. –  Joey Hirsh Jan 9 '13 at 15:42

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.