Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question is related to my earlier, even more open-ended question on tropilcalization. I will give some background and ask my question at the end.

On R, consider the family of commutative, associative operations ⊕h, indexed by positive h, given by xh y = -h ln( exp(-x/h) + exp(-y/h) ). For h>0, the semigroup (R,⊕h) is isomorphic to the normal additive groupsemi (R>0,+). But as h → 0, for fixed x and y we have the limit xh y → min(x,y). This defines the tropical addition, and it's conventional to include the additive unit ∞ = -h ln(0).

There is a continuous/integral version of the observation that in the limit, + (in the guise ⊕h) becomes max. Indeed, let f : RnR be a continuous function bounded below, and assume that f grows to +∞ in all directions, fast enough so that for any h>0, the integral ∫Rn exp(-f(x)/h) dx converges (or anyway for h small enough; if it converges for any h then it does for all smaller h, and to converge for small h requires only very mild growth rates; as |x|ε for ε>0 is certainly good enough). Then asymptotically as h → 0, the integral is supported at the (or, rather, in a formal neighborhood of the) globally-minimal values of f. To make the correspondence explicit, note that ∫Rn exp(-f(x)/h) dx is (exp of -h-1 times) the "⊕h integral" of f, whereas the "⊕0 integral" of a function is its global minimum value.

There is another fact about asymptotic integrals, related by "Wick rotation", which is what the physicists call it any time you switch a variable from pure-real to pure-imaginary. As above, let f : RnR continuous and growing reasonably quickly to infinity, but this time for real non-zero h consider the integral ∫Rn exp(-f(x)/(ih)) dx, where i = √-1. The integral never converges absolutely (and so does not exist in the sense of Lebesgue), but it converges conditionally as a Riemann integral, e.g. if f is differentiable and given mild conditions on the growth of the norm of the derivative. (If f grows at least as fast as |x|1+ε, we're fine, I think.) In any case, let's assume that the integral converges conditionally for small enough (real, non-zero) h. Then the method of stationary phase shows that asymptotically, the integral is supported at (formal neighborhoods of) critical points of f.

My question is this: Is there a version of "tropical arithmetic" like the operation ⊕h defined above but related to the Wick-rotated integral? The most naive approach, replacing h by ih and so considering xih y = -ih ln( exp(-x/ih) + exp(-y/ih) ), is not defined because of the problem of picking a branch of the logarithm. But perhaps this problem can be fixed for small h, or by approximating each pure-imaginary ih by ih+ε for some very small positive ε? Put another way: what is the operation on numbers that corresponds to {critical points} in the same way that min(x,y) corresponds to {global minimum}?

share|improve this question
    
Related question: to what extent can we extend $x \oplus_h y$ to complex-values of $x,y$? –  Theo Johnson-Freyd Oct 19 '09 at 6:18
    
Where is the geometry, as suggested in the title? –  S. Carnahan Oct 19 '09 at 15:27
    
@Scott: perhaps "tropical-arithmetic" is a better tag? I think I'm almost but not quite able to make new tags, but I might be misremembering the cut-off. –  Theo Johnson-Freyd Oct 19 '09 at 18:12

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

There has been very little activity on this question, so I'm going to take it off the unanswered list. In particular, in a related question, kilimanjaro linked to this paper, which answers some of my questions and includes many references.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.