Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a question about the proof of proposition 1.13 in Deligne and Milne, Tannakian Categories. Let $C,C'$ be two rigid tensor categories and $F,G : C \rightarrow C'$ be two tensor functors. Let $u : F \rightarrow G$ be a morphism of functors. Define the morphism $v : G \rightarrow F$ by $$ v(X) : G(X) \simeq G(X^\vee)^\vee \xrightarrow{{}^t u(X^\vee)} F(X^\vee)^\vee \simeq F(X).$$

Why is $v$ the inverse of $u$ ?

share|improve this question
    
Isn't a well-placed question, is $v$ a funtor or a transformation between funtors $F$ and $G$? –  Buschi Sergio Dec 11 '12 at 18:39
5  
This is a job for... String Diagram Man! :-) –  Todd Trimble Dec 11 '12 at 21:04
    
Nitpick: instead of saying "morphism of functors", you should say "morphism of tensor functors" (there's a distinction). –  Todd Trimble Dec 12 '12 at 0:29
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Okay, here is a link to my web at the nLab which provides a diagrammatic proof (for one of the two equations that must be verified; the other equation is established similarly).

Of course, the gigantic diagram which you will find did not spring from my head like Pallas Athena. It was assembled by first studying a simple string diagram proof, which unfortunately I can't draw for you in a convenient way. The big commutative diagram which results only looks intimidating.

share|improve this answer
    
I have added a condensed version of the diagram which might be easier to comprehend, together with a similar diagram for the other equation $v(X) \circ u(X) = 1$. Also added is a generalization of this result to 2-categories. –  Todd Trimble Dec 13 '12 at 16:13
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.