MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $C$ be a reduced curve in $\mathbb{P}^3$ of degree $d$. Does there exist $d$ points on $C$ such that there exists a $1-$dimensional family of hyperplanes in $\mathbb{P}^3$ passing through these points?

share|cite|improve this question
I changed the title ad removed the tags "deformation theory" and "hilbert schemes", which in my opinion were superfluous. – Francesco Polizzi Dec 11 '12 at 16:07

Assume that the curve $C$ is not degenerate and $d \geq 3$. Then, in order to fulfill your assumptions, $C$ must be reducible in $d$ lines, and furthermore each of these lines meets another fixed line $L$.

In fact, suppose that there are $d$ points on $C$ such that there exists a $1$-dimensional family of planes through these points. Since the base locus of a pencil of planes is a line, this means that the $d$ points belong to a line $L$.

Now take a general point on $p \in L$ and project $C$ from $p$ to $\mathbb{P}^2$. The projection is birational, hence we obtain a plane a curve $C'$ of degree $d$ with a point $p'$ of multiplicity $d$. Then $C'$ is necessarily the union of $d$ lines through $p'$. It follows that the curve $C$ is the union of $d$ lines in $\mathbb{P}^3$, and each of these lines is incident to $L$.

EDIT 1. As quid points out there is actually another possibility, namely when $C=L \cup D$, with $D$ any curve of degree $d-1$. In this case the projection from $p \in L$ is not birational, since it contracts $L$.

EDIT 2. As Auniked points out, one cannot assume that the projection is birational. In fact, the complete answer seems to be the following. Either $L$ is a component of $C$ and we are in the situation described in Edit 1, or there exist planes $H_1, \ldots, H_m$ containing $L$ and curves $C_i \subset H_i$ of degree $d_i$ such that $d_1+ \ldots + d_m=d$ and $C=C \cup \ldots \cup C_m$.

My original answer only dealt with the case $m=d$ and $d_1=d_2= \ldots =d_m=1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Even simpler: any two different planes in the family meet along a line. All d points must belong to it. – quim Dec 11 '12 at 18:27
Actually, there is another possibility: that the line L is a component of C, then there are no restrictions on the rest: C is composed of a line through the d points plus a curve of degree $d-1$. The argument "fails" in that the projection is not birational on C in that case. – quim Dec 12 '12 at 10:47
Of course you are right. If the line $L$ through the $d$ points is component of the curve, then it is contracted by any projection with center on it. I will edit the answer, thank you for pointing this out. – Francesco Polizzi Dec 12 '12 at 12:05
Hi Francesco, the projection from a generic $p \in L$ may not be birational! The correct answer seems to be that either $L$ is a component of $C$, or there are hyperplanes $H_1, \ldots, H_m$ containing $L$ and curves $C_j \subseteq H_j$ of degree $d_j$ such that $1 \leq m \leq n$, $d_1 + \cdots d_m = d$ and $C = C_1 \cup \cdots \cup C_m$. – auniket Dec 12 '12 at 20:26
Hi auniket, you are right! In fact, it seems that I overlooked many possibilities :-). I edited the answer, thank you. – Francesco Polizzi Dec 13 '12 at 8:47

A slightly different way to prove Francesco+auniket's result is as follows. First, given two different planes in the family, all $d$ points must lie in their intersection, which is a line $L$.

Second, every plane intersecting $C$ properly does so in $d$ points (counting multiplicities). So for every plane $H$ through $L$ intersecting $C$ properly, $H\cap C \subset L$. If there is any such plane, then general planes through $L$ intersect $C$ properly. Let $H_1, \dots, H_m$ be the (therefore finitely many) planes through $L$ which meet $C$ nonproperly. Then $C \subset \bigcup H_i$, each $H_i$ contains a component $C_i$ of $C$ of degree $d_i$ which goes through $d_i$ of the $d$ points. If there is no such plane on the other hand, then $L$ is a component of $C$.

Actually, this is projecting from $L$ rather than projecting from a point of $L$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.