MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Shahn Majin and Xavier Gomez say in the beginig of their article (Noncommutative cohomology and electromagnetism on $\mathbb{C}_q [SL_2]$ at roots of unity) that tha action of left $\mathbb{C}_q [SL_2]$-crossed modules is given by: \begin{eqnarray} \nonumber a\triangleright \left(\begin{array}{cc} e_a&e_b\\ e_c&e_d\\ \end{array} \right)= \left(\begin{array}{cc} q e_a +q\mu^2 e_d &e_b\\ e_c&q^{-1}e_d\\ \end{array} \right) \end{eqnarray}

\begin{eqnarray} \nonumber b\triangleright \left(\begin{array}{cc} e_a&e_b\\ e_c&e_d\\ \end{array} \right)= \left(\begin{array}{cc} \mu e_c &\mu e_d\\ 0&0\\ \end{array} \right) \end{eqnarray}

\begin{eqnarray} \nonumber c\triangleright \left(\begin{array}{cc} e_a&e_b\\ e_c&e_d\\ \end{array} \right)= \left(\begin{array}{cc} \mu e_b &0\\ q\mu e_d&0\\ \end{array} \right) \end{eqnarray} \begin{eqnarray} \nonumber d\triangleright \left(\begin{array}{cc} e_a&e_b\\ e_c&e_d\\ \end{array} \right)= \left(\begin{array}{cc} q^{-1} e_a &e_b\\ e_c&q e_d\\ \end{array} \right) \end{eqnarray}

My question is how (or where) can we find the details of this result ? Thank you

share|cite|improve this question

There's nothing too difficult going on here. The left module relations you describe for $\Lambda_{SL_N} =$span{$e_a,e_b,e_c,e_d$} can be seen to come from the construction of $\Lambda^1_{SU_N}$ as a quotient $C_q[SL_N]^+/I$, where $I$ is the ideal (from the famous Woronowicz paper) generated by the elements \begin{eqnarray*} b^2,~c^2,~b(a-d),~c(a-d), {\bf z} b, {\bf z} c,~{\bf z}(a-d), \end{eqnarray*} $$ ~ {\bf z}(q^2a+d-(q^2+1))\\ ~a^2+q^{2}d^2-(1+q^2)(ad+q^{-1} bc), $$ for ${\bf z}=q^2a+d-(q^3+q^{-1})$.

The basis they use is the obvious one, and the relations follow from basic algebraic manipulation. (More generally, one can describe the ideal using the quantum Killing form for the standard coquasi-triangular structure of $C_q[SL_N]$, but this is not at all necessary for this example.) I'll try to add more detail later.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.