# a question on game of chess [closed]

In the game of chess,it is a proven fact that either of the three conditions hold: 1)white has a winning strategy 2) black has a winning strategy or 3)either of them can at least force a draw. It is conjectured that white has a winning strategy. What is the evidence behind this conjecture (why is 1) favoured wrt the other two

-

## closed as off topic by Andreas Blass, Alain Valette, David White, domotorp, quid Dec 11 '12 at 16:14

Questions on MathOverflow are expected to relate to research level mathematics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I am not sure how widespread this conjecture is believed to be true. I think the conjecture that most people believe is that white has a strategy to at least draw. I guess in games where there is some symmetry between the sides, the player moving first often has the advantage. For example, in the take turns punching each other game, the first person has an edge. Another example is that white has a strategy to at least draw in the "2-move" version of chess via strategy stealing. – Tony Huynh Dec 11 '12 at 13:21
I am not an expert here, but to me it seems very unlikely white has a winning strategy. The range for a draw in chess is quite large. – user9072 Dec 11 '12 at 13:54
See also this question: mathoverflow.net/questions/107385/… – Yoav Kallus Dec 11 '12 at 15:39
Who does actually conjectures that White has a winning strategy? One hundred and forty years of Grandmaster practice seems to suggest that the game is about even. – Andrea Mori Dec 11 '12 at 22:57