MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

S^3 can be seen as a U(1)-bundle over S^2 (Hopf fibration). It has first Chern number 1 or -1. Denoting with z_1,z_2 coordinates on C^2 and restricting to S^3 the natural connection form is \omega_1=\bar z_1 dz_1+\bar z_2 dz_2

Consider now the U(1) bundles over S^2 with Chern number n>1. They have total space S^3/Z_n where the Z_n action on C^2 is generated by (z_1,z_2)->(z_1\exp(i2\pi/n),z_2\exp(i2\pi/n)). I know that the appropriate connection form which generalises the one of the Hopf bundle is \omega_n=n(\bar z_1 dz_1+\bar z_2 dz_2) I do not understand where the factor of n comes from. In other terms how do I see, from the defining properties of a connection form (or otherwise), that a factor of n is needed and/or that any other factor would give a one-form which is not a connection form?

share|cite|improve this question

If you work out how the circle group acts on the fibres then the connection form has to pull-back to the Maurer-Cartan form on the circle group. That will fix the multiple.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.