2
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to classify finite non-abelian nilpotent groups with at most four maximal subgroups? Is it possible to answer the question for finite non-abelian solvable groups?

$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

4
$\begingroup$

A finite solvable group $G$ which is not nilpotent and has at most $4$ maximal subgroups satisfies $G/\Phi(G) \cong S_{3},$ where $\Phi(G)$ is the Frattini subgroup, the intersection of all maximal subgroup of $G.$

Suppose $G$ is solvable, not nilpotent, and has at most $4$ maximal subgroups. Suppose also that $\Phi(G) = 1,$ which is no loss of generality. Then $G$ has a maximal subgroup $M$ which is not normal. Then $M$ has at most $4$ conjugates, and there is at least one maximal subgroup of $G$ which is not conjugate to $M.$

Now $M = N_{G}(M)$ by maximality, as $M \not \lhd G.$ We have $[G:M] < 4,$ but we can't have $[G:M]= 2$ as $M$ is not normal. Hence $[G:M] = 3$ and $G/K \cong S_{3},$ where $K$ is the intersection of all $G$-conjugates of $M.$ But then by the isomorphism theorems, there are $4$ maximal subgroups of $G$ containing $K.$ These are the three conjugates of $M,$ together with a normal subgroup $L$ of index $2.$ But this yields $K \leq \Phi(G)$ since $G$ has at most $4$ maximal subgroups. By assumption, $\Phi(G) = 1,$ so that $K = 1$ and $G \cong S_{3}.$ It's actually possible to analyse the nilpotent case in a similar manner, and go a litle bit further than Arturo does. If $G$ is finite nilpotent with at most $4$ maximal subgroups we may reduce to the case $\Phi(G) = 1,$ so that $G$ is an Abelian group of squarefree exponent. If $G$ has a non-cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroup for some prime $p,$ then there are at least $1+p$ maximal subgroups whose index is a power of $p.$ If $G$ is not a $p$-group, there is at least one maximal subgroup of $G$ containing a Sylow $p$-subgroup of $G,$ and we have then exhibited at least $2+p$ maximal subgroups of $G,$ so $p=2.$ Even when $p=2,$ it easily follows that $G$ is the direct product of the form $A \times B,$ where $B$ is a cyclic $q$-group for some odd prime $q$ and $A$ is a $2$-group which may be generated by $2$ elements. The ultimate conclusion is that a non-Abelian finite nilpotent group $G$ which has at most $4$ maximal subgroups has one of the forms: A non-Abelian $3$-group which can be generated by $2$ elements; a group of the form $A \times B,$ where $A$ is a non-Abelian $2$-group generated by $2$ elements and $B$ is a cyclic $q$-group for some odd prime $q$ ($B$ may be trivial).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ As the Arturos adevicement "thanks for your comprehensive and useful answer." $\endgroup$
    – sebastian
    Jan 13, 2013 at 21:32
5
$\begingroup$

A finite nilpotent group is a direct product of its $p$-parts, and maximal subgroups have prime index; so you have at most four primes dividing the order of the group.

If $G$ is a $p$-group, then $G/\Phi(G)$ is an elementary abelian $p$-group; if it has order greater than $p^2$, then it has more than $4$ maximal subgroups; and if $p\gt 3$ and $G/\Phi(G)$ has order $p^2$, then you have more than $4$ maximal subgroups. If $G/\Phi(G)$ is cyclic, then $G$ is cyclic and has a unique maximal subgroup. This reduces the problem to $p=2,3$, $G/\Phi(G)$ of order $p^2$, and then to a restricted way in which you can add direct factors.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ @yakov: May I ask why you put that as a comment to my answer, instead of Robinson's? Seems to me like that would make more sense. $\endgroup$ Jun 27, 2016 at 18:41
1
$\begingroup$

If $G$ is a $p$-group, it is noncyclic and $p=3$, $\text{d}(G)=2$.

If $G$ is a noncyclic and non-prime powe group, then $G=P\times C$, where $P$ is a $2$-generator $2$-group and $C>\{1\}$ is a cyclic $q$-group, a prime $q>2$. The proof is trivial.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.