MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a question concerning the complexification of a real analytic Riemannian manifold. Let $(M,g)$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. It is a well known fact that in a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero section of the cotangent bundle $T^{*}M$, $M$ admits a complexification. By Stenzel and Guillemin this complexification is called the adapted complex structure. It is even Kähler. In this complexification, the phase function $\varphi$ solves the homogenous Monge-Ampere equation. My question is now: are there Kähler structures on a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero section in the cotangent bundle of $M$, which turn $M$ into a Lagrangian submanifold and such that $M$ is isometrically embedded in $U$, BUT differ from the adapted complex structure (up to biholomorphism)? Do all such structures come from an adapted complex structure? Is this already known or can it be derived easily?

share|cite|improve this question
    
Try the paper "Symplectic geometry and the uniqueness of Grauert tubes" by D. Burns and R. Hind, deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41842/1/… – Liviu Nicolaescu Dec 7 '12 at 13:45
    
I dont see how this answers my question? I am interested in: are there Kälhler structures in a neighbourhood of the zero section of some Riemannian manifold that are not adapted in the sense of Guillemin and Stenzel? – Dmitri Dec 7 '12 at 16:51

Suppose that $M \subset Z$ is a compact Lagrangian submanifold of a Kaehler manifold $Z$ with Kaehler form $\omega$. Take a function $f$ so that $\partial \bar\partial f=0$ at every point of $M$. Then for a small enough neighborhood of $M$ in $Z$, $\omega+i\partial\bar\partial f$ is a Kaehler form in which $M$ is a Lagrangian manifold with the same induced metric. In your case, take $Z=T^*M$ with the Stenzel metric.

share|cite|improve this answer
    
Is it clear that the new metric is not biholomorphic to the old one? – Sebastian Goette Mar 28 at 9:24
1  
Biholomorphisms of a complex $n$-dimensional manifold depend on $2n$ functions of $n$ variables, while our function $f$ is one essentially arbitrary function of $2n$ variables, so it seems unlikely that a biholomorphism can identify such metrics. Of course, this isn't a rigorous argument. But $f$ can have compact support here, so it is easy to make a rigorous argument. – Ben McKay Mar 28 at 9:33

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.