MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).
3

Let $(E,\phi)$ be a $G$-Higgs bundle $\phi\in H^{0}(X,ad(E)\otimes D)$ where $D$ is a divisor on X.

I suppose that $(E,\phi)\in \mathcal{M}^{ani}$ the anisotropic locus.

In particuler, this bundle is stable as a Higgs bundle because, it doesn't have any reduction to a parabolic.

Does it imply that the underlying bundle $E$ is itself stable?

More generally, when a stable Higgs bundle has a stable underlying bundle.

flag
A detailed answer to your question in the case of Riemann surfaces is given in Proposition 3.3 of Hitchin's "Self-duality equations on a Riemann surface". – Sebastian Dec 6 at 7:42

1 Answer

3

First, in the standard definition $D = K_X$, so I will give an example in this case. Let $X$ be a curve of genus 2 and $E = O \oplus O(P)$ for a point $P \in X$. Clearly $E$ is unstable with $O(P)$ being the only destabilizing subbundle. Define $\phi$ to be the composition $$ O \oplus O(P) \to O(P) \to O(K_X) \to O(K_X) \oplus O(K_X + P), $$ where the first map is the projection, the second is the embedding given by the point $P' \in |K_X - P|$, and the third is the embedding into the first summand. It is clear that $O(P)$ does not extend to a Higgs subbundle, so $(E,\phi)$ is stable.

link|flag

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.