Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We consider $A = C_{b}(X)$, the ring of continuous bounded functions on a completely regular space $X$. Let $\DeclareMathOperator{\SpecMax}{SpecMax} \SpecMax(A)$ be the set of maximal ideals of $A$ with the Zariski topology.

We know that there is an embedding of topological spaces: $$ \psi : X \longrightarrow \SpecMax(A) $$ defined by $\psi(x) = m_{x} := \lbrace f\in A \mid f(x)=0\rbrace$.

My question is: We can construct the Stone–Čech compactification of $X$ if we take $\bar{X}:=\overline{\psi(X)}$, but we must prove that $\overline{\psi(X)}$ is compact. We know that $\operatorname{Spec}(A)$ is quasi-compact, but I don't know if $\SpecMax(A)$ is also. Then how can we prove that $\overline{\psi(X)}$ is compact?

share|improve this question
    
the base of Zarisky topology is maked by sets $V(I)$ of all promes $p$ containing $I$, for $I$ a subset (or a ideal is you want) of $A$. THen if $Max$-$Spec(A)\subset \cup_i U_i$ for a familiy of open sets $U_i\subset X$, by the definition of Zariski topology above follow that $X= \cup_i U_i$ (every prime ideals is contained in a maximal one). –  Buschi Sergio Nov 21 '12 at 19:57
    
Sergio, the definition of (quasi-)compact requires that every open covering contains a finite subcovering. –  Ralph Nov 22 '12 at 10:02
    
@Ralph, Rajkov ask "how prove that X is quasi-compact?" (then every close of X is quasi-compact too). Now from what I write above if $X$ has a open cover, i.e. $X= \cup_i (U_i\cap X)$ for open sets $U_i\subset Spec(A)$, then $X\subset \cup_i U_i$ and follow that $Spec(A)\subset \cup_i U_i$ then there are finite collection $U_1,\ldots U_n$ that cover $Spec(A)$, then cover $X$. –  Buschi Sergio Nov 23 '12 at 17:09
add comment

1 Answer 1

You can prove that $\text{SpecMax}(A)$ is quasi-compact in the same way as you do for $\text{Spec}(A)$. Also note that $$\overline{\psi(X)} = \text{SpecMax}(A)=:\beta X.$$ I know of no (very) short proof that $\text{SpecMax}(A)$ is Hausdorff (in Zariski topology). However, a proof is presented in the proof of Theorem 9 (pdf-page 11) in the following well-written paper:

E. Hewitt: Rings of real-valued continuous Functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 64(1948),45-99

share|improve this answer
    
Hi Ralph. If $R$ is a comutative pm-ring( ring in which any prime ideal contained in unique maximal ideal), then the space of maximal ideals, Max(R), is a Hausdorff space. see "COMMUTATIVE RINGS IN WHICH EVERY PRIME IDEAL IS CONTAINED IN A UNIQUE MAXIMAL IDEAL, PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 30, No. 3, November 1971" –  user29350 Nov 23 '12 at 16:38
    
Yes, but I don't think the proof that each prime ideal of $A$ is contained in a unique max. ideal (can be found in Gillman-Jerison), is shorter than a direct proof that SpecMax(A) is Hausdorff. Anyway, the OP should now have enough references to see why the max spectrum is Hausdorff. –  Ralph Nov 23 '12 at 20:10
    
Ok. You are right. But there is a question about the space of minimal prime ideals of a reduced ring $R$. We know that this space is Hausdorff and need not be compact. So it has a compactificaton. Now, what is a compactification of $\mathrm{Min}(R)$, the space of minimal prime ideals of $R$? Note that $\overline{\mathrm{Min}(R)}=\mathrm{Spec}(R)$, but $\mathrm{Spec}(R)$ is not a Hausdorff space. –  Ali Nov 23 '12 at 20:32
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.