Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose $G({\mathbb Z})$ is a higher rank non-cocompact arithmetic group (e.g. $SL_n({\mathbb Z})$ with $n\geq 3$, or $Sp_{2g}({\mathbb Z})$ with $g\geq 2$). I have seen a result (http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0409345) which says that every finite index subgroup $\Gamma $ of $G({\mathbb Z})$ contains a smaller finite index subgroup generated by three elements.

Does anyone know ANY example of $G({\mathbb Z})$, where three can be replaced by two? I believe Alan Reid has some result in this direction.

[Edit] That 2 should suffice is a conjecture, attributed to Alex Lubotzky. That $3$ DO suffice for non-uniform higher rank lattices in the result mentioned in the link. What I am asking is just ONE example where 2 generators suffice.

share|improve this question
    
Just a remark: for arithmetic subgroups of $PSL(2,C)$, it is conjectured there are finitely many 2-generated arithmetic groups. This is known to be a consequence of Lehmer's conjecture. –  Ian Agol Mar 2 '13 at 16:57
    
Thank you. This is most interesting. –  Aakumadula Mar 2 '13 at 17:03
add comment

1 Answer

The result to which you refer is not a result but a conjecture of A. Lubotzky. Long and Reid have constructed some examples. -- the relevant preprints can be found on Alan Reid's web page. I assume that Lubotzky's conjecture is about three and not two generators because he did not want to be too ambitious -- nobody knows anything concrete, to the best of my knowledge.

share|improve this answer
    
Igor, Thanks very much for the link to Alan Reid's paper. The result that I was thinking about was one by Ritumoni Sarma, where he proved the three generator (non-cocompact higher rank lattice) property. However, no one to whom I have talked (admittedly a small number!) could give me an example where two suffice. For co-compact, you are right: nobody (to whom I have talked) knows any result. –  Aakumadula Nov 19 '12 at 6:08
    
Actually, I didn't know about Sarma's result (actually, it's Sarma and Venkataramana)! Thanks for the reference! –  Igor Rivin Nov 19 '12 at 13:01
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.