MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can the Poincaré $3$-homology sphere be smoothly embeded in $\mathbb R^4$? If it is not the case, how can we fix it?

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off topic by Dan Petersen, David White, Ian Agol, Oscar Randal-Williams, Chris Gerig Nov 14 '12 at 21:07

Questions on MathOverflow are expected to relate to research level mathematics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The answer is no, as a google search found for me: . What do you mean by "how can we fix it"? – j.c. Nov 14 '12 at 15:48
Any homology $3$-sphere admits a locally flat topological embedding in $4$-space, by a result of Freedman. Is this the kind of fix you were after? – Mark Grant Nov 14 '12 at 16:01
I wonder if someone would add here the reference for the Freedman result. Thanks! – tweetie-bird Nov 14 '12 at 21:15
why is this question closed? It seems to be related to several interesting things. – Daniel Pomerleano Nov 15 '12 at 5:21
I didn't vote to close but the question needs a fair bit of work following the guidelines of – j.c. Nov 15 '12 at 13:13

If I remember correctly, given M any homology 3-sphere then M x [0,1] can be embeded in R^4. Is this right?

share|cite|improve this answer
In the book "4-Manifolds and Kirby Calculus" by Robert E. Gompf,András I. Stipsicz, pag.345. – Flux Nov 14 '12 at 21:42
They admit topological embeddings but not necessarily smooth embeddings; the page you cite is specific about that point. – j.c. Nov 15 '12 at 13:16
...but I cannot understand why in this case the Whitney embedding result doesn't hold for a general smooth manifold... is a homology 3-sphere not smooth? – Flux Nov 15 '12 at 15:34
Wouldn't Whitney embedding theorem need 6 dimensions? Am I missing something? Wikipedia says you start with an immersion with transverse self-intersections, then you fix this. (I paraphrase.) – tweetie-bird Nov 17 '12 at 14:20

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.