MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $BS(m,n)$ be the Baumslag-Solitar group defined by $B(m,n) = < a,b ~|~ b a^m b^{-1} = a^n > $, $mn \neq 0$. There is a linear representation of $BS(m,n)$ by mapping $a$ to the matrix $\left(\begin{matrix} 1&1 \cr 0&1\end{matrix}\right)$ and $b$ to the matrix $\left(\begin{matrix} \frac{n}{m}&0 \cr 0&1\end{matrix}\right)$. Denote this representation homomorphism as $f$, assume $|m| \neq |n|$, my main question is:

What is the kernel of $f$ ?

Some observations

(1) Commutator of the form $ [a, a^b], [a,a^{b^2} ], [a,a^{b^3}] \ldots$, are in the kernel. Do these elements generate the Kernel of $f$? Do they form an infinite generated free group? .

(2) If $|m| \ne |n|$ and either $|m| = 1$ or $|n| = 1$ then $f$ is known to be injective.

share|cite|improve this question
The answer is No, if you take $|n|=1=|m|$. – Anton Klyachko Nov 13 '12 at 23:35
Hi, Anton Klyachko. Your answer is contained in my second observation. – Xiaolei Wu Nov 13 '12 at 23:52
If $|m|=|n|=1$, then $f$ is not injective and the kernel is not generated by the commutators (1). – Anton Klyachko Nov 13 '12 at 23:57
Anton, you are right. I will edit the question to rule out those cases. – Xiaolei Wu Nov 14 '12 at 0:35
Actually, if $|m|=|n|$, then $f$ is not njective and its kernel is not generated by commutators (1). – Anton Klyachko Nov 14 '12 at 0:42
up vote 11 down vote accepted

The kernel $K$ is a free group of infinite rank.

To see that it is a free group, take the action of $BS(m,n)$ on the Bass-Serre tree $T$ of the usual graph of groups presentation for the usual HNN decomposition $Z*_Z$, where one of the $Z \mapsto Z$ edge-to-vertex homomorphisms is multiplication by $m$ and the other is multiplication by $n$. Each vertex stabilizer of $BS(m,n)$ is conjugate to the $\langle a \rangle$ subgroup, whose intersection with $K$ is trivial. So, all vertex stabilizers of the action of $K$ on $T$ are trivial, implying that all edge stabilizers are trivial. $K$ therefore acts properly discontinuously on the tree $T$.

One can show that the rank is infinite by exhibiting arbitrarily long simple closed edge paths in the quotient graph $T/K$, although maybe there is a slicker way.

share|cite|improve this answer
Yes, but how does it actually sit in the mother group? – Igor Rivin Nov 14 '12 at 2:44
@Igor: Would a good answer to your followup question be a listing of a free basis in terms of a,b? If so, that could be worked out by going back and forth between the action of BS(m,n) on $\mathbb{H}^2$ and the action on T. – Lee Mosher Nov 14 '12 at 13:16
@ Lee, I will try to work it out by myself using your method. If I could answer all the question I asked, I will accept your answer. – Xiaolei Wu Nov 18 '12 at 5:18

This isn't a complete answer, but here is an observation that I hope is helpful.

Since linear groups are residually finite, the kernel clearly contains the finite residuum, ie the intersection of all the finite-index subgroups. By Theorem 4.1 of this paper by Jack Button and m and n are coprime, the finite residuum is equal to the second derived subgroup.

(Thanks to Yves Cornulier for pointing out the missing hypothesis.)

share|cite|improve this answer
if $m,n$ are not coprime, I think there are non-metabelian finite quotients. (blast, why don't we have a word to mean the "residuallyfinitization"...) – YCor Nov 14 '12 at 7:40
Sorry, yes of course you're right. If m and n are not coprime then in fact B(m,n) is large, ie has a finite-index subgroup that surjects a non-abelian free group. My answer holds in the coprime case. – HJRW Nov 14 '12 at 10:18
(Yves, re: the word, we do; it's the profinite completion! It's just in the wrong category.) – HJRW Nov 14 '12 at 10:20
No, I mean the quotient by the intersection of the finite index subgroup. It's distinct from profinite completion. – YCor Nov 14 '12 at 10:40
Yves - I know! But it's morally the same thing as the profinite completion - just in a different category. Just my bad joke. – HJRW Nov 14 '12 at 13:03

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.