2
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have a full rank, integer sublattice $L$ of the integer lattice $\mathbb Z^d$, where we fix the dimension $d$. Consider the Gram matrix $M$ of $L$, relative to some basis for $L$, and reduce all the entries of $M$ mod $4$. Is there a nice clean description of all the finite types of such mod $4$ reductions of Gram matrices, as we vary over all full rank integer sublattices $L \subset \mathbb Z^d$ while keeping the dimension $d$ fixed?

There is a theorem that attempts to describe the Gram matrix of an integer lattice mod powers of $2$, in J.W.S. Cassells' book ``Rational quadratic forms", Section VIII.4, p. 117 in this book. But in the beginning of that section he writes "...This section is only for the masochistic". I would be very grateful if anyone has found a cleaner description and/or proof, at least in the mod $4$ case.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I use the 2-adic decompositions for various tasks. I can't say I know what would be useful for you, but let me call your attention to page 141, Lemma 4.3. This refers back to Lemma 5.2 on page 123, (paraphrase) if $d(g) = u^2 d(f)$ for some unit $u$ and $$ g_{ij} \equiv f_{ij} \pmod {2^{ v_2(d(f)) + 2}}, $$ then $f,g$ are $\mathbb Z_2$-equivalent. Here $v_2$ is the 2-adic valuation, the highest power of 2 dividing $d(f)$ in this case.

Meanwhile, I can point you to A Canonical quadratic form for the ring of 2-adic integers, Burton W. Jones, Duke Math. J. 11 (1944), 715-727. This and two others are at the top of page 120 in Cassels, look for ``parliamentary draftsman.'' Note that Watson (1976), Mathematika 23 94-106, The 2-adic density of a quadratic form, is the source for the 2-adic terms in Conway and Sloane on the Mass Formula. In turn Watson's own 1960 book is the main source for the 1976 article.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Great! Let me look it up and see what they have. $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2012 at 3:47
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot, Will. This kind of reference, namely the Burton Jones paper, is what I was looking for. $\endgroup$ Nov 14, 2012 at 16:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.