MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let W be the Weyl a group of a semisimple simply connected group over C.

Let I={1,...,r} the set of simple roots.

For $w\in W$, I denote by supp(w) the subset of I corresponding to the simple reflexions that appear in a reduced decomposition of w.

Let w an element such that supp(w)=I and length(w)>r+1, is it true that there exist an element w' such that

1/ $w'\leq w$

2/length (w')=r+1



share|cite|improve this question
I guess the answers make it clear that your question is really about arbitrary Coxeter groups (with a finite generating set)? In any case, I've added a tag. But on the other hand, the question itself doesn't concern representation theory or algebraic geometry. – Jim Humphreys Oct 29 '12 at 15:02
up vote 5 down vote accepted

I agree with the answer below, but to turn it into a rigorous proof one could argue in a slightly different fashion:

Let $l$ be the length of $w$ and let $Red(w)$ be the set of $all$ reduced expressions for $w$. Given ${\bf r}=(i_1,\ldots, i_l)\in Red(w)$ denote by $k({\bf r})$ the smallest $k\le l$ such that $i_k$ appeas in $\bf r$ more than once. Let ${\bf t}=(j_1,\ldots, j_l)\in Red(w)$ be such that $k({\bf t})\ge k({\bf r})$ for all ${\bf r}\in Red(w)$. Write $w=s_{j_1}\cdots s_{j_l}$ and let $w'$ be the element of $W$ obtained from $w$ by deleting $s_{j_k}$ from the above expression where $k=k({\bf t})$. By the choice of $k$ any reduced expression for $w'$ will have full support. Repeat this step until the length decreases to $r+1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
@Sasha: This looks efficient, though $r$ in the question was the rank. (Too many letters used in this subject.) – Jim Humphreys Oct 29 '12 at 14:59

Yes. Choose a reduced expression $red(w)$ for $w$. Now delete from $red(w)$ the rightmost letter $s_i$ that appears more than once in $red(w)$. This will yield a reduced expression for an element $v\in W$ with the same support as $ w$ and length one less than $w$, with $v$ less than $w$ in Bruhat order. Repeat until you have decreased the length to $r+1$.

Added later: To prove that my claim holds for an arbitrary reduced expression, rather than making a special choice, one can use the exchange axiom for Coxeter groups as follows. Suppose the new expression obtained by deleting $s_i$ is not reduced, then consider the leftmost letter $s_{i_t}$ to the right of $s_i$ such that $s_{i_1} \cdots \hat{s_i} \cdots s_{i_t}$ is nonreduced. Now consider the rightmost $k$ so that $s_{i_k}\cdots \hat{s_i} \cdots s_{i_t}$ is nonreduced. Then $s_{i_k}\cdots \hat{s_i} \cdots s_{i_{t-1}}$ and $s_{i_{k+1}}\cdots \hat{s_i} \cdots s_{i_t}$ will be reduced expressions for the same Coxeter group element. This implies that the former expression must contain the letter $s_{i_t}$, a contradiction to $s_{i_t}$ only appearing once in $red(w)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I also seem to have double-used the variable $r$, so just corrected this silly notational error. – Patricia Hersh Oct 29 '12 at 16:34
@Patricia: A former student of Mike Artin told me that he liked the term "local notation" when re-assigning previously defined notation during a lecture. (P.S I hope you and Sasha haven't done some graduate student's homework problem.) – Jim Humphreys Oct 30 '12 at 12:25
@Jim: that's a good point. It was easy for me to imagine someone might need this in a lemma in a paper, but it would have been better if I'd asked the OP first in a comment what the context of the question was rather than answering straight away. I've heard of one grad student getting in a lot of trouble for asking homework questions here at MO -- so many people look at this site regularly that I would think there'd be a serious danger for such a student of getting caught. – Patricia Hersh Nov 1 '12 at 13:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.