3
$\begingroup$

Suppose $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ is a bounded domain. Let $u\in H_0^1(\Omega)$ and $\tilde{u}\in L^2(\Omega)$ satisfies $$\int_\Omega\nabla u\nabla v=\int_\Omega \tilde{u}v,\ \forall\ v\in C_0^{\infty}(\Omega)$$

Suppose that there exist a set $\Gamma$ of positive measure such that $\nabla u=0, a.e.\ x\in\Gamma$. How can one show that $\tilde{u}=0,\ a.e.\ x\in\Gamma$?

Any help is appreciate. I have to solve this problem without considering the fact that $\tilde{u}=-\Delta u$. I know that i have to take some "nice" $v\in C_0^{\infty}(\Omega)$, but what $v$?

Edit 1: Why im trying to solve this problem? Let $p\geq 1$. Suppose $u\in W_0^{1,p}(\Omega)$ and $\tilde{u}\in L^q(\Omega)$ $(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1)$ satisfies $$\int_\Omega|\nabla u|^{p-2} \nabla u\nabla v=\int_\Omega \tilde{u}v,\ \forall\ v\in C_0^{\infty}(\Omega)$$

In this case we dont have enough regularity to show that $\tilde{u}=-\Delta_p u$, so i need a more direct aproach, and consequently i think that this aproach is the same for both cases.

Lastly we can have the $\Phi$-laplacian too and considering the spaces where it makes sense, we have $$\int_\Omega\Phi(|\nabla u|)\nabla u\nabla v=\int_\Omega \tilde{u}v,\ \forall\ v\in C_0^{\infty}(\Omega)$$

Edit 2: In general, consider $\sigma$ a vector valued function. Suppose $\sigma$ is in a convenient space and $$\int_\Omega \sigma\cdot\nabla v=\int_\Omega \tilde{u}v,\ \forall\ v\in C_0^{\infty}(\Omega)$$

where, $\cdot$ stands for inner product. Now i want to conclude the same thing for all the cases above.

Note: $\tilde{u}$ is called weak divergence of $\sigma$.

Edit 3: In any open set $U$ contained in $\Gamma$, we can take functions with compact supoort in $U$ and conclude that $\tilde{u}=0,\ a.e.\ x\in U$, but in the general case, how to proceed? Maybe this is not valid in a general set with positive measure? Any opinion?

Thanks

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ "I have to solve this problem without considering the fact..." So it is homework? Or are you trying to find a proof with fewer assumptions? How do you know you "...have to take some "nice" $v$"? $\endgroup$
    – David Roberts
    Oct 25, 2012 at 23:02
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidRoberts, i want to apply the some result for more general operator, for instance, $p$-laplacian or even $\phi-laplacian$. In both case i dont have the same regularity as i have here, so i ask to not use the fact that $\tilde{u}=\Delta u$. Can you do this? $\endgroup$
    – Tomás
    Oct 25, 2012 at 23:36
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidRoberts, i dont know for sure that i have to take a nice $v$, but if you decompose $\Omega$ as union of $\Gamma$ and its complementary, seems to be that the answer. Any idea? $\endgroup$
    – Tomás
    Oct 25, 2012 at 23:40
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, no, I don't. I'm not actually an analyst :-) Good luck with this problem! $\endgroup$
    – David Roberts
    Oct 26, 2012 at 0:42

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.