MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $M$ be an orientable 3-manifold. On $M$, fix a vector field $X$. The curl of $X$ relative to the Riemannien metric $g$ and the volume form $\mu$, $\nabla_{g,\mu}\times X$, is defined by the formula $$ di_X g=i_{\nabla_{g,\mu}\times X}\mu.$$

When is it possible to choose a metric and volume form such that $$ \nabla_{g,\mu}\times X=\lambda X,$$ where $\lambda$ is a nowhere vanishing function?

There are many $X$ for which such a metric and volume form can be found. In particular, $X$ that arise as Reeb vector fields relative to some contact 1-form on $M$ are all examples (

share|cite|improve this question
Do you require that the volume form be that given by the metric (and orientation), or is it chosen separately? I'm guessing the former but your notation makes me unsure. – Paul Reynolds Oct 25 '12 at 23:35
@Paul Reynolds : Sorry for not being clear. I'm not requiring the volume form to be the one determined by the metric. – Josh Burby Oct 26 '12 at 0:00
In that case if you can find $g$ and $\mu$ then you can find them so that $\lambda = 1$. I was going to say something about the case $X$ is non-vanishing, but it's pretty much what is said in the paper you linked to. – Paul Reynolds Oct 26 '12 at 17:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.