Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've been trying to read Gross' paper on Heegner points on $X_0(N)$ and I am stuck on a few details. The definition he is working with is that a heegner points is a pair $y=(E,E')$, where $E$ and $E'$ are elliptic curves admitting an isogeny that has cyclic kernel of order $N$ and where $E$ and $E'$ both have complex multiplication by the order $\mathcal{O}$ of discriminant $D$ in a quadratic imaginary field $K$. Gross goes on to explain that we may assume the lattice for $E$ is a fractional ideal $\mathfrak{a}$ and the lattice for $E'$ is $\mathfrak{b}$ such that the ideal $\mathfrak{n}=\mathfrak{a}\mathfrak{b}^{-1}$ is proper ideal of $\mathcal{O}$ such that the quotient $\mathcal{O}/\mathfrak{n}$ is cyclic of order $N$. It is the next line that I don't understand:

"Such an ideal will exist if and only if there is a primitive binary quadratic form of discriminant $D$ which properly represents $N$...". The line goes on, but this is one of the things I'm stuck on. I've tried googling some notes/papers on binary quadratic forms, but I can't find anything that helps me understand what a binary quadratic form representing $N$ has to say about an order admitting a cyclic quotient. An explanation or a good reference would be much appreciated.

The second and, I think, more important part of my confusion is a bit later on in the same section: Gross goes on to explain that if we have such an $\mathfrak{n}$, we can construct a heegner point as follows. Let $\mathfrak{a}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}$-submodule of $K$ and let $[\mathfrak{a}]$ denotes its class in $Pic(\mathcal{O})$. Let $\mathfrak{n}$ be a proper $\mathcal{O}$-ideal with cyclic quotient of order $N$, put $E=\mathbf{C}/\mathfrak{a}$, $E'=\mathbf{C}/\mathfrak{a}\mathfrak{n}^{-1}$. They are related by an obvious isogeny and thus determine a Heegner point, denoted $(\mathcal{O},\mathfrak{n},[\mathfrak{a}])$.

Next, given $y=(\mathcal{O},\mathfrak{n},[\mathfrak{a}])$, we can find the image of it in the upper-half plane by picking an oriented basis $\langle\omega_1,\omega_2\rangle$ of $\mathfrak{a}$ such that $\mathfrak{a}\mathfrak{n}^{-1}=\langle\omega_1,\omega_2/N\rangle$. Then $y$ corresponds to the orbit of $\omega_1/\omega_2$ under $\Gamma_0(N)$. Lastly, since $\tau\in K$ it follows that it satisfies $A\tau^2+b\tau+C=0$ for some integers $A,B,C$ such that $gcd(A,B,C)=1$.

Finally, what I don't understand is that Gross claims that $D=B^2-4AC, A=NA'$ from some $A'$ and $gcd(A',B,NC)$. I don't see what the $\tau$ we cooked up has to do with the discriminant of our order. I have read a paper that defined a Heegner point to be a quadratic imaginary point in the half-plane such that $\Delta(\tau)=\Delta(N\tau)$. I have seen how this would help with part of the claim above, but I don't see why in this situation, $\Delta(\tau)=\Delta(N\tau)$. In fact, it seems that everything I'm confused about here is the fact that it seems to be the case that $$D=\Delta(\tau)=\Delta(NT),$$ where $\Delta$ denotes discriminant.

Any insight into these two questions would very appreciated.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

I think the following facts, which you can find in Cox's book Primes of the Form $x^2+ny^2$, will alleviate your confusion. First off, if ${\mathfrak a}=[\alpha,\beta]$ is a proper ideal of ${\mathcal O}$ then one can show that $$ f(x,y) := \frac{N(\alpha x-\beta y)}{N{\mathfrak a}} $$ is a primitive binary quadratic form of discriminant $D = {\rm disc}(\mathcal O)$. Moreover, the map that associates such an ${\mathfrak a}$ to such an $f(x,y)$ induces an isomorphism from the class group ${\rm Pic } ({\mathcal O})$ onto the form class group $C(D)$. The inverse of this map is given by $$ f(x,y) := ax^2+bxy+cy^2 \mapsto [a,(-b+\sqrt{D})/2] = [a,a\tau], $$ where $\tau$ is the unique point in the upper-half plane such that $f(\tau,1)=0$. It's not hard to show that we'll have ${\mathcal O} = [1,a\tau]$ for all such $\tau$ (see Addendum below). In particular, we see that ${\mathcal O}/[a,a\tau] \cong {\mathbb Z}/a{\mathbb Z}$ is cyclic.

The last piece of the puzzle is this: a positive integer $N$ is represented by a form $f(x,y)$ in $C(D)$ if and only if $N$ is the norm of some ideal in the corresponding ideal class in ${\rm Pic}({\mathcal O})$ (loc. cit., Theorem 7.7(iii)). On the other hand, $N$ is properly represented by such an $f(x,y)$ if and only if $f(x,y)$ is properly equivalent to $Nx^2+bxy+cy^2$ for some $b,c \in {\mathbb Z}$. Now the results mentioned in the preceding paragraph will take you home.

Addendum: Given a proper ideal $\mathfrak a$ of $\mathcal O$, we can recover $\mathcal O$ as the set ${\mathfrak a}^\vee = \{x \in K \mid x\mathfrak a \subset \mathfrak a \}$. This last set is easy to compute in the following special case. Let $K=\mathbb Q(\tau)$ be quadratic and suppose that $ax^2+bx+c$ is the minimal polynomial of $\tau$, where $a,b,c$ are coprime integers. Then $[1,\tau]^\vee = [1,a\tau]$ (loc. cit., Lemma 7.5).

By applying this to Gross's $\mathfrak a = [\omega_1, \omega_2] = \omega_2 [\tau, 1]$, which is a proper ideal in some order $\mathcal O$, we find that $\mathcal O = [A\tau, 1]$. Consequently,$$D = {\rm disc}({\mathcal O}) = \det \begin{pmatrix}1 & A\tau \\ 1 & A\bar{\tau} \end{pmatrix}^2 = B^2 - 4AC.$$ The assertion about $A$ can be gotten in a similar manner.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. This certainly clears up the first bit of confusion. I'm afraid I still don't see how to convince myself of the later facts when we try to find the point in the half plane corresponding to a heegner point. –  user27464 Oct 22 '12 at 19:59
    
I added some clarification. I hope it helps. –  Faisal Oct 22 '12 at 23:37
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.