Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It looks like the natural way to define this isomorphism is $(g_1, ..., g_k )\mapsto ([g_1], g_2, ..., g_k ) $ where $[g_1]$ is the congruence class of $g_1$ in $G/H$. I can see why this is onto, but I don't think $\Delta$ would be part of the kernel. So, it looks like I'm considering the wrong map, but what else is there to consider?

Thanks! I ran across this in a research paper, and it's just not coming to me why this is true.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Stefan Kohl, Ricardo Andrade, Chris Godsil, abx, Felipe Voloch Nov 16 at 17:38

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "MathOverflow is for mathematicians to ask each other questions about their research. See Math.StackExchange to ask general questions in mathematics." – Stefan Kohl, Ricardo Andrade, Chris Godsil, abx, Felipe Voloch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This is not really a research level question, but set $\Delta(G)$ to be the corresponding diagonal subgroup of $G^{k}$ using $G$ in place of $H$. Embed $G^{k-1}$ inside $G^{k}$ by adding the identity in the $k$-th component. Note that $G^{k} = \Delta(G) \times G^{k-1}$ with these identifications. –  Geoff Robinson Oct 22 '12 at 8:09
A slight modification of Geoff's answer may be easier to see. There is an isomorphism from $G^k$ to itself taking $\Delta$ to $H\times\{0\}^{k-1}$, namely the isomorphism sending $(g_1,g_2,g_3,\dots,g_k)$ to $(g_1,g_2-g_1,g_3-g_1,\dots,g_k-g_1)$. –  Andreas Blass Oct 22 '12 at 11:32
Thanks. I really like Andreas' answer, but I unfortunately can't designate it as "best answer" for some reason (perhaps a problem with my account?). –  Reeve Oct 22 '12 at 18:59

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.