Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hallo,

I am reading the paper "Hyperkaehler structures on the total space of holomorphic cotangent bundles" by D.Kaledin and I am asking if it is possible to embedd a real-analytic Kähler manifold, isometrically, as a special Lagrangian in a Calabi-Yau manifold. Acctualy what I am looking for is the following: Start with a compact real-analytic Kähler manifold $(M, I, \omega)$ and in a neigbourhood of the zero-section in the cotangent bundle $T^{*}M$ there should exists a holomorphic $(n,0)-$form $\Omega$ (with respect to some complex structure on this neigbourhood) and a Kaehler form $\tilde{\omega}$ such that the forms $Im(\Omega)$ and $\tilde{\omega}$ vanishes when restricted to $M$ (the zero section) and $\tilde{\omega}^{2n} = C_{n} \Omega \wedge \bar{\Omega}$ for some constant $C_{n}$ that depends only on $n$. I know that one can do this. But I don't know some references where I can find a explanation of this. Is it sufficient just to read the paper of Kaledin or do I have also to switch to other references? By using Kaledin's paper what ingredients are necessary for a proof of this embedding problem? I am a beginner in Calabi-Yau manifolds and Hyperkaeler manifolds and I would be very thankfull if someone has the answers. I hope for a lot of replys and also hope that this question is not too trivial.

Best Regards, Pavel

share|improve this question
    
try looking at papers of Stenzel: math.osu.edu/~stenzel.3/research/publications/ricci-flat.pdf –  Spiro Karigiannis Oct 20 '12 at 12:48
    
    
Your question suggests that you are looking for an isometric embedding of the given Kähler manifold as a special Lagrangian in a Calabi-Yau manifold, but you don't mention this requirement in the text. I'll just point out that the induced metric on any special Lagrangian submanifold of a Calabi-Yau manifold is necessarily real-analytic, so it follows that it is not possible, in general to isometrically embed a given Kähler manifold as a special Lagrangian in some Calabi-Yau manifold. –  Robert Bryant Oct 20 '12 at 22:19
    
ok, I see. lets assume that the given Kaehler manifold is also real analytic. Is it then possible? how can one explain this? what are the ingredients in showing this? –  Pavel Oct 21 '12 at 6:01
    
I am not exactly sure what you mean by "explanation", but since you're asking for references, have a look at Birte Feix's thesis "Hyperkaehler metrics on cotangent bundles". There she constructs the HK metric in a different way. See also mathoverflow.net/questions/46752/… –  Peter Dalakov Oct 21 '12 at 14:30
show 2 more comments

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Disclaimer: I am not sure what kind of "explanation" you are looking for. I would guess that you are after the observation (due to Hitchin), that complex Lagrangian submanifolds become special Lagrangian after rotating the complex structure.

Observation: Let $X$ be a hyperkaehler manifold. Let $\{I,J,K\}$ be a triple of complex structures, satisfying the quaternionic identities, and let $\{\omega_I,\omega_J,\omega_K\}$ be the respective Kaehler forms. Let $M\subset (X,I,\omega_I)$ be a complex-lagrangian submanifold for the complex-symplectic form $\omega^c= \omega_J+i\omega_K$. Then $M$ is a special lagrangian submanifod of $ (X,J, \omega_J,\Omega = (\omega_K+i\omega_I)^{\dim_{\mathbb{C}} M})$.

(Actually, if $\dim_{\mathbb{C}} M$ is odd you must either take $i\Omega$ as your holomorphic volume form, or use the more relaxed definition of special Lagrangian. )

Here "complex-Lagrangian" means that $M\subset (X,I)$ is a complex submanifold and $\left. \omega^c\right|_M=0$.

So given a real-analytic Kaehler manifold, you embed it as the zero-section of the cotangent bundle, take the Kaledin-Feix metric on a (formal) tubular neighbourhood, and rotate the complex structure.

share|improve this answer
add comment

How can you show then that, after a rotation, it satisfies the Calabi-Yau equation?

share|improve this answer
    
You should not ask a new question as an answer to an existing question. You can either create a new question or post a comment. But it's not at all clear what you mean. A hyperKahler manifold is Calabi-Yau in an $S^2$ worth of ways. This is clear, because the triple $\omega_I$, $\omega_J$, and $\omega_K$ are all parallel with respect to the Calabi-Yau metric, so the $\Omega$ that Peter defines is parallel, thus the pair $(\omega_J, \Omega = (\omega_K + i \omega_I)^{\dim_{\mathbb C} M}$ is a Calabi-Yau structure. –  Spiro Karigiannis Oct 23 '12 at 18:19
    
Yes but does it follow then that $\omega_{J}^{n} = c_{n} \Omega \wedge \Omega$, where $c_{n}$ is a constant depending only on $n$, where $n = dim_{\mathbb{C}}M$? –  Mina Oct 24 '12 at 12:26
    
ok I will post it as a question :). –  Mina Oct 24 '12 at 16:46
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.