2
$\begingroup$

Hello! My question is about the realization of homology class.

The definition of the realizaion of homology class is: for manifold M and a homology class $z\in H_k(M)$, k is an integer. If we find a k-dimensional manifold N and a map $f:N \rightarrow M$ such that $f_* [N]=z$, $[N]$ is the fundamental class, then we call the homology class $z$ can be realized.

For this problem, Thom has the following theorem:

Thom[1954] For every manifold M, consider a interger coefficient homology class $z\in H_*(M)$, that there exist a interger $l$ and $lz$ can be realized.

My Question is Simple: Why we should add this interger $l$?

Thom's original paper is written by French and I cann't understand it. Recently, I am reading a paper by A.Gaifullin:Combinatorial Realisation of Cycles and Small Covers and the result is related to Thom's paper.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ As far as I can tell, Thom's paper is about realization by EMBEDDED submanifolds. $\endgroup$
    – Igor Rivin
    Oct 19, 2012 at 16:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, Thom gives examples of compact differentiable manifolds where one cannot take $l=1$. Are you asking for an english explaination of these examples? $\endgroup$
    – J.C. Ottem
    Oct 19, 2012 at 16:44
  • $\begingroup$ Some torsion classes can not be realized as fundamental classes of manifolds, that's why $l>1$ can happen. $\endgroup$ Oct 19, 2012 at 16:45

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Duplicate of this question, which has a very good answer by Eric Wofsey.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, that really helps me a lot, thank you! $\endgroup$
    – Siqi He
    Oct 20, 2012 at 23:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.