Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking for a reference or a proof of the following statement :

Let $M$ be a compact smooth manifold with boundary. Then the space of embeddings $\partial M\times[0,1]\to M$ inducing the identity $\partial M\times\{0\}\to \partial M$ is contractible.

share|improve this question
    
What topology do you want to use on that space? When your domain is non-compact there's a lot of different topologies to choose from. If you let the domain be $\partial M \times [0,1]$ (being the identity on $M \times \{0\}$ then you've got a more-or-less canonical topology on the space. People call it the weak or Whitney topology. –  Ryan Budney Oct 12 '12 at 0:05
    
Ryan. I'm not sure I have some flexibility on what topology I can use. I have edited the question to take your comment into account. –  Geoffroy Horel Oct 12 '12 at 0:18
    
You still have flexibility. There's the $C^0$ uniform topology, the $C^1$ uniform topology, etc, up to the $C^\infty$ weak/Whitney topology. –  Ryan Budney Oct 12 '12 at 0:39
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 8 down vote accepted

The theorem you're looking for is proven in Cerf's dissertation.

J. Cerf, Topologie de certains espaces de plongements, Bull S.M.F., tome 89 (1961) 227-380.

This is for the case you mention, when you look at the space of $C^k$-smooth embeddings with the $C^k$-Whitney/weak topology. Cerf proves a lot of other similar foundational results about embedding spaces, tubular neighbourhoods, collars, restriction maps and so on.

To set up the proof, just take your favourite proof that collars are unique up to isotopy. These proofs can all be souped-up to work at the embedding space level, you just have to make smart choices for your maps.

For example, consider the space of smooth embeddings $f : [0,1] \to [0,\infty)$ with $f(0)=0$. Here is a homotopy:

$$F(t,x) = \frac{f((1-t)x)}{1-t} \text{ for } t < 1$$

and

$$F(1,x) = f'(0)x$$

Notice that this is an isotopy from $f$ to a linear map. The space of linear embeddings is contractible.

The proof for general collar neighbourhoods is not much more sophisticated than the above, but you have the complication of not having such nice coordinates in your manifold. You can make up for that in various ways, one being embedding the manifold in Euclidean space and using tubular neighbourhoods. Another would be to use flows.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.