MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the preprint arXiv:math/0505432v1 by Batyrev and Kreuser I have found (on pages 2 and 10) the claim that "by a recent result of Kresch and Vistoli [arXiv:math/0301249]" the (usual) Brauer group of a Calabi-Yau threefold is isomorphic to its cohomological Brauer group. However, in that preprint of Kresch and Vistoli I have not found a word about Calabi-Yau or anything. (Admittedly, it is about Brauer groups). Could anyone help me to clear the mess?

P.S. For what I know, if there is always an isomorphism is a big open problem which is only settled in a few special cases. So, I suppose, if this is known indeed for Calabi-Yau threefolds (for 10 years by now), then every expert must be aware of it.

share|cite|improve this question
It follows from a theorem of Gabber that for any quasi-projective variety the usual Brauer group is equal to the cohomological Brauer group. See, for example – ulrich Oct 5 '12 at 13:13
Thank you for the reference – Alex Gavrilov Oct 6 '12 at 14:22
up vote 4 down vote accepted

It was proved by Gabber and De Jong that the cohomological Brauer group of a quasi-compact scheme with an ample invertible sheaf equals its Brauer group. Our preprint does not contain this result.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.