Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $G$ be a group (if it helps, assume that $G$ is a Lie group or finite). Is a pair of elements $(g, h) \in G \times G$ determined up to simultaneous conjugacy by the conjugacy class of every element $w(g, h) \in G$, where $w$ runs over all words in the free group on two generators?

If $G$ is finite, can we bound the length of the words $w$ needed in terms of $|G|$?

If the answer to the above question is positive, let $\pi$ be a second group (if it helps, assume that $\pi$ is finitely presented). $G$ acts on the set $\text{Hom}(\pi, G)$ by pointwise conjugation. Is an element $\phi \in \text{Hom}(\pi, G)$ determined up to conjugacy by the conjugacy class of every element $\phi(w)$ where $w \in \pi$? (The above is the special case $\pi = F_2$.)

share|cite|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 11 down vote accepted

For a concrete example consider the symmetric group on 6 symbols. The pairs ((1,2)(3,4),(1,3)(2,4)) and ((1,2)(3,4),(3,4)(5,6)) both generate Klein 4-groups. Words in them are either trivial of conjugate to (1,2)(3,4). The generated subgroups (and thus the pairs) are not conjugate as one fixes two points.

share|cite|improve this answer

Suppose a group $G$ had the property that n-tuples $\lbrace x_1,\dots, x_n\rbrace$ and $\lbrace y_1,\dots,y_n\rbrace$ satisfy: if $w(x_1,\dots,x_n)$ is conjugate to $w(y_1,\dots,y_n)$ for all $w\in F_n$ then there is a uniform conjugator $g$ so that $y_i=gx_ig^{-1}$. Then as a corollary you get that if an endomorphism of $G$, satisfies $\varphi(x)$ is conjugate to $x$ for all $x$ then $\varphi$ is an inner automorphism.

However there are non-examples to this property in several classes of groups, including finite groups. The original property does however hold for torsion-free $\delta$-hyperbolic groups. This is proved in the paper "On endomorphisms of torsion-free hyperbolic groups", which also has references to the previous work.

share|cite|improve this answer
Interesting! So I guess $\pi$ can't have $F_2$ as a quotient group. Do you know what happens if $\pi$ is, say, the fundamental group of a closed surface? – Qiaochu Yuan Oct 4 '12 at 7:41
@Qiaochu: Most of those are hyperbolic! – Steve D Oct 4 '12 at 22:37
@Steve: my understanding is that the result Gjergji describes is about examples of $G$ such that the result above fails for $\pi = F_2$. I want to change $\pi$ to a different group and ask if the result is still true for all $G$ in that case. – Qiaochu Yuan Oct 5 '12 at 1:21
@Qiaochu: ah ok, I thought you were asking if the original question was true for surface groups. – Steve D Oct 5 '12 at 4:43

Just saw this old question thanks to the link from the new MO question #212929. Another flavor of counterexample: let $G$ be the $ax+b$ group over some field $k$, and let $t(b) \in G$ be the transformation $x \mapsto x + b$. Then the $t(b)$ with $b \neq 0$ are all conjugate, but a pair $(t(b_1),t(b_2))$ is simultaneously conjugate with $(t(b'_1),t(b'_2))$ iff $b_1/b_2 = b'_1/b'_2$. Suppose, then, that $b_1/b_2 \neq b'_1/b'_2$, and that both quotients are irrational (i.e. if $mb_1=nb_2$ or $mb'_1=nb'_2$ for some integers $m,n$ then $m=n=0$ in $k$). Then the pairs $(g,h) := (t(b_1),t(b_2))$ and $(g',h') := (t(b'_1),t(b'_2))$ are not related by simultaneous conjugacy, but cannot be distinguished by the conjugacy class of any $w(g,h)$.

The same is true if we take $G = {\rm SL}_2(k)$ or $G = {\rm PSL}_2(k)$ and work in its $ax+b$ subgroup $({* \; * \atop 0 \; *})$ [with $t(b) = ({1 \; b \atop 0 \; 1})$]. Indeed that was the example that first came to mind, suggested by the restriction to diagonalizable elements in MO 212929 (NB the $t(b) \in {\rm SL}_2(k)$ with $b\neq 0$ are not diagonalizable).

In the smallest finite examples of this kind, $k$ is the 4-element field, and $b_1/b_2$, $b'_1/b'_2$ are the two elements of $k$ other than $0$ and $1$. Then the $ax+b$ group is isomorphic with $A_4$, and ${\rm SL}_2(k) \cong {\rm PSL}_2(k) \cong A_5$, and in each case we can take $g=g'=(12)(34)$, $h=(13)(24)$, and $h'=gh=(14)(23)$. [The pairs $(g,h)$ and $(g',h')$ become conjugate in $S_4$ and $S_5$, which are the extensions of the $ax+b$ group and ${\rm SL}_2(k)$ by the Galois automorphism of $k$ that also switches the two irrational elements of $k$.]

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.