1

Suppose we have two probability measures $P_1$ and $P_2$ on some Riemannian manifold $(\Sigma,g)$. There are many potential distance measures between $P_1$ and $P_2$:

  • The Wasserstein distance
  • For $P_1$, $P_2$ given by density functions $f,g\in L^2$, we can use the functional distance $\|f-g\|_2$ (or any other $p$-norm)
  • The obvious generalization of histogram-related distances from the machine learning literature

Instead of representing a probability distribution directly, however, we can write a probability amplitude function $\psi:\Sigma\rightarrow\mathbb{C}$. That is, we assume $\psi\in L^2(\Sigma,\mathbb{C})$ with $\int_\Sigma |\psi|^2=1$. So, $\psi$ looks like the square root of a probability density.

Is there a natural distance metric on the space of such probability amplitude functions?

I realize that $L_2$ distances work here, but they don't have much meaning in this probabilistic view of the world, since $\exists c\in\mathbb{C}$ with $|c|=1$ such that $\|\psi-c\psi\|_2\neq0$, even though $\psi$ and $c\psi$ yield the same distribution function $|\psi|^2$. I'm looking for a norm that can be computed in terms of $\psi$ directly rather than having to first resort to $|\psi|^2$ directly. Writing in terms of Laplace-Beltrami or Dirac operator eigenfunctions is fair game.

flag
Yes, it can distinguish between these cases. In fact, this may help clarify the role of the complex "redundancy" in expressing probability distributions using amplitude functions. – Justin Oct 4 at 16:55
Should it distinguish between $\psi$ and $c\psi$ with $|c|=1$, but $c$ not constant, like in quantum mechanics? If it should, one natural thing to look at is $\Vert \psi \otimes \psi^\ast - \phi \otimes \phi^\ast \Vert$ for some operator norm. If not, and you are really talking about distributions disguised this way, it is unclear what exactly you want... – Alexander Shamov Oct 4 at 16:55

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.