Welcome to MathOverflow

Question

1

I have the following question: If $A$ is a metrically oriented $n$-dimensional subset of $\mathbb{R}^N$ and $f$ is a continuous map from $A$ to $\mathbb{R}^M$ . We know that $\mathrm{Lip} f < +\infty$ $L^N$-almost everywhere, can we then continuously extends f to the whole $\mathbb{R}^N$ such that $\mathrm{Lip} f < +\infty$ $L^N$-almost everywhere? Here $\mathrm{Lip}$ is the local lipschitz constant of $f$.

edited Sep 28 at 22:03

Pietro Majer
19.7k●1●24●69

asked Sep 28 at 6:03

Changyu Guo
210●5

Of course one can use the Tietze extension theorem to extend f continuously to the whole space. The problem then is that whether it keeps the a.e. finiteness of the Lipf. – Changyu Guo Sep 28 at 6:10

What does "metrically oriented" mean? $\:$ What do you mean by "L^n-almost everywhere" $\hspace{0.6 in}$ and "L^N-almost everywhere"? $\;\;$ – Ricky Demer Sep 28 at 6:18

To "Ricky Demer": the term "metrically oriented" is from J.Heinonen and S.Rickman's paper "Geometric branched covers between generalized manifolds. Duke Math. J. 113 (2002)", it basically says that as A itself is a very good metric measurable space with n-dimensional Hausdorff measure (e.g. supports a (1,1)-Poincare inequality, n-Ahlfors regular, n-rectifiable), so Lipf<\infty L^n-a.e. means that as a metric measure space itself, Lipf is finite in Hausdorff n-measure a.e.. When you extend this map f, then f is defined on R^N which the corresponding measure should be L^N. – Changyu Guo Sep 28 at 6:27

2

@Changyu: Please, use proper TeX syntax; this would make your question more readable. – Misha Sep 28 at 6:55

Tapio Rajala · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-28 07:42:06Z UTC

You only need to assume that $A$ is a closed subset of $\mathbb{R}^N$ and then construct an extension of $f$ so that it is locally Lipschitz outside $A$. Something like what I explained in http://mathoverflow.net/questions/100693 should work (extending by hand using a Whitney decomposition). Now the extended mapping is locally Lipschitz exactly outside the same exceptional set as the original mapping. One has to be careful with the boundary points: if the original mapping was locally Lipschitz at the boundary, the extension is also (because of the way it is constructed).

Edit: Only now I noticed who was asking the question. You can drop by my office to discuss more, if there are any problems with the extension. :)

Misha · Answer 2 · 2012-09-28 06:53:03Z UTC

This is not a solution to your problem as I do not know what "metrically oriented" sets are. However, you could try to use Kirszbraun's extension construction and see what it gives in the context of your question:

Kirszbraun's proves that every Lipschitz function $f: A \to {\mathbb R}$ defined on an arbitrary subset of ${\mathbb R}^m$ has a Lipschitz extension to ${\mathbb R}^m$ with the same Lipschitz constant.

M.D. Kirszbraun, Uber die zusammenziehende und Lipschitzsche Transformationen, Fundamenta Math. 22 (1934), p. 77-108.

If you do not read German, you can find here a generalization of Kirszbraun's theorem.

Can we extend a a.e. Lipschitz map defined on a closed subset of \bR^N to the whole space such that it is still a.e. Lipschitz

Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

2 Answers

You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.