0
$\begingroup$

The complement of a codimension-one projective subspace of $\mathbb{R}\mathbf{P}^{3}$ is identifiable in a geodesic structure preserving manner with an affine $3$-space so that the group of projective transformations acting on it is identical with the group of affine transformations of the affine $3$-space. We call this set an affine patch.

In the above sentence what does the "geodesic structure preserving manner" part mean?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ The intersection of each geodesic in $\mathbb{R}P^3$ with the complement of the subspace is either empty or is identified with a line in the affine 3-space. $\endgroup$
    – Lee Mosher
    Sep 27, 2012 at 17:53
  • $\begingroup$ why do you say this? $\endgroup$
    – DAVID
    Oct 8, 2012 at 6:55
  • $\begingroup$ DAVID -- "in a geodesic preserving manner" means that one can identify the complement of a hyperplane with an affine space so that each geodesic in the projective space, which is a line, goes to a geodesic in the affine space, also a line. I.e., the metrics are different (one comlpete, one not) but their geodesics coincide. $\endgroup$
    – algori
    Nov 22, 2012 at 13:25

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Hi. One can read this in M. Berger's Geometry I, Chapter 5, from Springer Verlag. This is standard classical work. An affine space can be completed to a projective space by adding a subspace of codimension-one and a real projective space becomes an affine space by removing a subspace of codimension-one.

Also, please see my new MSJ book No. 27. One can find it in my homepage and http://mathsoc.jp/publication/memoir/memoirs-e.html. It has some explanations.

Anyway you can send me questions also.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ in your article " geometric structures on low-dimensional manifolds " section - 1. theorem - 3 , I really don't understand it. why we need to show that around the edges the identifications give us trivial holonomy elements? and why you said " at each sphere the triangulations are from points of RP2 " ? and then you concluded that " at each sphere and the vertex on it , the holonomy around the vertex is the identity map " ?? $\endgroup$
    – DAVID
    Dec 3, 2012 at 7:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.