MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Kaplansky in his paper titled by Projective Modules gave an important and essential theorem as follow:

Theorem: Let $R$ be a ring, $M$ an $R$-module which is a direct sum of (any number of) countably generated $R$-modules. Then any direct summand of $M$ is likewise a direct sum of countably generated $R$-modules.

But if you could take a look to the pattern of his proof, he applied the well ordering Theorem for proving it.

I am thinking about the relation of his proof with the well ordering theorem. More precisely I am thinking about the answer of the following question:

Question: Is the Kaplansky theorem equivalent with the Axiom of Choice or it can be proved with the weeker axiom(i.e.boolean prime ideal theorem)?

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.