Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Assume you have an almost connected simple Lie group G with trivial center. (In particular excluding non-algebraic examples such as the universal cover of SL_2(R).)

Such a group should automatically be an algebraic group over the reals resp. the complex numbers.

Is this true and why?

Can we in addition conclude (EDIT: under a good choice of the field and possibly additional assumptions?) that G is absolutely almost simple as an algebraic group?

EDIT: Asking this I do not want to regard a complex Lie group as a real algebraic group.

share|improve this question
I guess that by "be an alg. group over reals" you mean "is topologically isomorphic to the group of real points of a real algebraic group" (or equivalently, to avoid algebraic groups language, is topologically isomorphic to a Zariski closed subgroup in some $SL_n(\mathbf{R})$). Then $PSL(2,\mathbf{R})$ is a counterexample, although it has index two in $PGL(2,\mathbf{R})$ [the notation is dangerous: if you define $PSL_2(\mathbf{R})$ as the group of real points of the group scheme $PSL_2$, you get $PGL_2(\mathbf{R})$]. –  YCor Sep 19 '12 at 15:26
Also look at $PGL(2,{\bf C})$ viewed as a real Lie group. The complexification of its Lie algebra is not simple. –  Wilberd van der Kallen Sep 19 '12 at 15:40
@Yves Cornulier: can we resolve this problem in general by passing to a finite cover of the group under consideration? Hence maybe editing the question such that we ask for some finite cover of the Lie group to be always algebraic? –  Petra Schwer Sep 19 '12 at 15:58
@Wildberd: So you say that the additional conclusion does not hold, yes? –  Petra Schwer Sep 19 '12 at 16:02
@Petra: for many purposes, to have $G$ as a Zariski dense, open (for the ordinary topology) subgroup of finite index in the group of real points of some algebraic groups, is enough: you can invoke Zariski topology, etc. Otherwise if $G$ is connected for the ordinary topology, it indeed admits a finite covering, that consists of the real points of the simply connected covering (in the algebraic sense) of the corresponding algebraic group. –  YCor Sep 19 '12 at 17:31

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The answer is yes for complex Lie groups, and follows from the classification. (Root data are in fact defined over $\mathbb{Z}$: a complex semisimple group has not only an underlying algebraic, but even an arithmetic structure). For a more direct explanation, see Theorem 6.3 in the book "Lie Groups and Lie Algebras III" by Onischik-Vinberg: any connected complex Lie group satisfying $G = [G,G]$ and admitting a faithful linear representation (which for semisimple groups is automatic), has a unique underlying complex algebraic structure.

For real Lie groups this is not quite true, as noted above.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the reference! I'll have a look at it. Do you know how to make a precise statement for the real case? –  Petra Schwer Sep 19 '12 at 16:09
@Petra: You can find the same theorem in the book "Lie Groups and Algebraic Groups" by Onishchik and Vinberg, Section 3.3.4, Theorem 5 on page 125. –  Mikhail Borovoi Sep 19 '12 at 16:29
@Petra: If $G$ is an adjoint connected semisimple $\mathbf{R}$-group and $G^{\rm{sc}} \rightarrow G$ is the simply connected central cover in the algebraic sense then $G^{\rm{sc}}(\mathbf{R})$ is connected (and a finite cover of the centerless $G(\mathbf{R})^0$). If we let $H$ vary through the connected semisimple $\mathbf{R}$-groups that are simply connected in the algebraic sense then $H \rightsquigarrow H(\mathbf{R})$ is fully faithful from the category of such $H$ to the category of (connected) Lie groups. Is this what you want to understand (or maybe Borovoi's reference explains it)? –  user28172 Feb 8 '13 at 14:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.