MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $E \subset \mathbb{P}_\mathbb{C}^2$ be an elliptic curve. If $E$ has complex multiplication (by anything) then the theory of complex multiplication in particular tells us that if $\sigma \in \textrm{Aut}(\mathbb{C})$ then $E^\sigma$ will be isogenous to $E$. Suppose $\textrm{End}(E) \cong \mathbb{Z}$ do we still have that $E^\sigma \cong E$ or are there some obvious counterexamples? What if we insist that the $j$-invariant, $j(E)$ is an algebraic number?

share|cite|improve this question
Isogenous is not the same as isomorphic (ie $\simeq$). Are you asking whether in general an elliptic curve over $\bf C$ is isogenous to any of its conjugates by an automorphism of $\bf C$ ? This is very likely not true although I don't have a counterexample at hand. – Damian Rössler Sep 16 '12 at 5:56
I mean it's clear that if $j$ is transcendental then an automorphism of $\mathbb C$ takes it to any other transcendental $j$ invariant, which is an uncountable set, but there are uncountably many isogenous curves. But there should also be counterexamples for $j$ algebraic. – Will Sawin Sep 16 '12 at 7:08
A curve over a galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ that isomorphic to all of its conjugates is called a $\mathbb{Q}$-curve, and by work of Ribet and the recent proof of Serre's conjecture, these are known to be modular (classic $GL_2(\mathbb{A}_\mathbb{Q})$). I think this forces the $j$-invariant, being some integration of a modular form on the upper half plane, to be in either a CM, or a totally real, extension of $\mathbb{Q}$. So any $j$-invariant with field of definition not CM or totally real, should provide a counter example. An expert should verify this, or, more probable, refute this. – Dror Speiser Sep 16 '12 at 8:50
Dror: you probably mean isogenous, not isomorphic. – René Sep 16 '12 at 10:00
@Will Savin: you mean "countably many isogenous curves"... – Damian Rössler Sep 16 '12 at 13:29
up vote 15 down vote accepted

We say that an elliptic curve $E$ over a number field $K$ is an elliptic $\mathbf{Q}$-curve if it is is isogenous to its Galois conjugates $E^\sigma$. These were first studied by Benedict Gross, but were later studied by Elkies, Ellenberg, Ribet, and many others. It's possible to show that $\mathbf{Q}$ curves are modular, independently of the BCDTW modularity theorem, and that even though they are defined over $K$, their $p$-torsion Galois representations (at least away from the degrees of said isogenies) descend down to $\mathbf{Q}$. Elkies also famously showed if $E_{/K}$ is a $\mathbf{Q}$-curve without CM, there must be a geometrically isogenous curve $E'_{/L}$ such that $Gal(L/\mathbf{Q}) \cong (\mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z})^r$ for some integer $r$. This comes down to showing that the moduli space of elliptic $\mathbf{Q}$-curves of degree $N$ form a certain very special quotient of $X_0(N)$. For details on most of this, see Jordan Ellenberg's "$\mathbf{Q}$-curves and Galois representations" ( )

share|cite|improve this answer

One way to get a counterexample is to take any elliptic curve $E$ over a quadratic field $K$ whose conductor is a prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}$ lying over a split prime $p$ in $\mathbb{Q}$. This means that $E$ has multiplicative reduction at $\mathfrak{p}$. If $\sigma$ is the non-trivial automorphism of $K/\mathbb{Q}$, then $E^\sigma$ has conductor $\mathfrak{p}^\sigma \neq \mathfrak{p}$, so $E^\sigma$ has good reduction at $\mathfrak{p}$. Any isogeny $E \to E^\sigma$ would be defined over a number field, and multiplicative/good reduction are both stable under finite field extension. Since isogenous curves have the same reduction type, $E$ and $E^\sigma$ cannot be isogenous.

An example: the two curves of minimal norm conductor over $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})$ have norm conductor 31, but their conductors are the two different ideals of norm 31. Check out William Stein's table:

As a double check, you can even tell from the Hecke eigenvalues in the table that the curves are conjugate to one another.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.