Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider Hilbert spaces $V$,$H$; a closed quadratic form $a$ with domain $V$; and its associated operator $A$ on $H$. (If necessary, the form can be assumed to be coercive.) For the sake of simplicity, assume the embedding of $V$ into $H$ to be compact (even trace class, if necessary), so that $A$ has purely point (real) spectrum.

Assume the operator $A$ to have a Weyl-type spectral asymptotics.

Now, take a new quadratic form $b$ which is in some sense small: form bounded or form compact, for example, so that $a+b$ still is a closed quadratic form. Are any conditions on $b$ available that would ensure the operator associated with $a+b$ to have Weyl-type spectral asymptotics, too?

Thank you in advance.

share|improve this question
    
You should be able to encode Weyl asymptotics into an appropriate norm on the resolvent. Then analyze stability of this norm under perturbations. –  Helge Sep 12 '12 at 22:57
    
I am not quite sure I understand your idea. Weyl asymptotics is an assertion on the eigenvalues (which lie on the right half of the real line), whereas it seems to me that form methods typically give you some (rough) estimate on the norm of the resolvent in the left halfplane only. –  Delio Mugnolo Sep 13 '12 at 13:40

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Let me elaborate a little bit on my idea. Denote by $\lambda_j$ the eigenvalues of the operator $A$. Then Weyl-asymptotics means that $$ N(E) = \\#(j: \lambda_j < E) < C \cdot E^\alpha. $$ Consider now the operator $(A)^{-1}$ with eigenvalues $\lambda^{-1}$ ... and consider its Schatten $p$ norm $$ \|A^{-1} \|_p = \sum _{j} \lambda_j^{- p} = p \int_0^{\infty} \frac{N(E) dE}{E^{p-1}}. $$ This is finite for $p >\alpha + 1$, so it suffices to investigate stability of the $p$ norm of the resolvent, which is standard.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for your answer. The first part of it is a very nice idea, but I cannot yet make complete sense of its second part. When you write that estimating the $p$-norm of a perturbation is standard, I cannot see why. This is indeed clear if the operator associated with $a+b$ is of the form $A+B$, but this is not necessarily true in this setting - think of the case where $b$ is a boundary integral, for example, so that the operator associated with $a+b$ is a boundary perturbation of $A$ (but there are other relevant cases). –  Delio Mugnolo Sep 14 '12 at 11:04
    
In fact, what I would need is exactly a way to estimate the $p$-norm of the operator associated with $a+b$ just by properties of $A$ and $b$. (Observe that similar problems arise if one tries to find a sectoriality estimate of the operator associated with $a+b$). –  Delio Mugnolo Sep 14 '12 at 11:04
    
Lemma 5.2. in its.caltech.edu/~helge/Papers/RelOsc2.pdf –  Helge Sep 14 '12 at 17:11
    
Helge, I was not aware of that result of Kato. Thanks for pointing it to me. Still, the idea of linking Weyl's asymptotics to Schatten norms is quite ingenious (or at least it was completely unknown to me before). –  Delio Mugnolo Sep 17 '12 at 18:01
    
edit: after trying to fill the details I realized that Helge's idea is great to translate Weyl asyptotics into the language of Schatten norms, which can then be easily handled; still, I don't see at all how to translate an assertion on Schatten norms (i.e., on convergence of a certain series) back to an assertion on Weyl asymptotics - unless we already assume that the perturbed operator has polynomial grow in the spectrum. [continues] –  Delio Mugnolo Oct 23 '12 at 8:12

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.