I like to ask for beautiful mathematical theorems with short proof. A proof is short in my sense if it is at most one page assuming basic notations and very basic results a second year student will know and understand. I do not like to discuss what beauty means...I have now written down a script with 107 such theorems (in my sense) and their proof and I have ideas for another 20. One the one hand I would be very thankful for theorems I have yet not considered. On the other hand I like to see if there is some consensus which theorems with a short proof are beautiful.
closed as not constructive by Felipe Voloch, Henry Cohn, Benjamin Steinberg, Todd Trimble♦, Suvrit Sep 11 '12 at 5:27As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 


The standard evaluation of $\int_{\infty}^{\infty} \exp(x^2) dx.$ 


Cantor's diagonal argument to prove that $\mathbb{R}$ is uncountable. 


Picard's little theorem is remarkable, and its oneline proof led Littlewood to remark that it would be the world's shortest Ph.D. thesis. 


L.M. Kelly's proof of the SylvesterGallai theorem: in any configuration of $n$ points in the plane, not all on a line, there is a line containing exactly two of the points. See Aigner & Ziegler, "Proofs from the Book", chapter 8. 


The proof(via the pigeonhole principlecontinued fractions would need too much preparation) that when D>0 is not a square then the "Pellian equation" xxDyy=1 has a nontrivial solution. 


Fermat's proof, by infinite descent, that there is no Pythagorean right triangle whose area is a square might qualify. 


@Paul Monsky's proof of Monsky's theorem: a complete proof starting from nothing takes two pages. (doesn't quite meet the criteria, but what the heck). 


Euler's formula $$\mathrm{e}^{i \theta} = \cos \left( \theta \right) + i \sin \left( \theta \right)$$ when considered as a theorem. From whatever angle you look at it, almost all the proofs are short and extremely beautiful. 

