Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Are there non-trivial (i.e. excluding concepts that can be defined only for $p>0$) statements in algebraic geometry that hold for all fields of characteristic $p$ for all prime $p$ but are known to be false in characteristic zero?

share|improve this question
4  
You should be more specific to avoid trivial answers, like the "theorem" stating that "not all morphisms are separable". –  Dan Petersen Sep 9 '12 at 18:38
2  
I agree this should be made more specific to exclude trivial examples, e.g. "there exist non-smooth Fermat hypersurfacees". –  algori Sep 9 '12 at 18:55
    
How about the rationality of the zeta function? –  Olivier Sep 10 '12 at 7:48
add comment

6 Answers

up vote 13 down vote accepted

Here are two examples.

The moduli space of dimension $g$ principally polarized abelian varieties $A_g$ contains complete codimension $g$ subvarieties in any positive characteristic $p$ (for instance, the locus of abelian varieties with no nontrivial $p$-torsion points), but not in characteristic $0$ (by Keel and Sadun arXiv:math/0204229).

The other example is also a resul of Keel (arXiv:math/9901149). It states that a nef and big line bundle $L$ on a projective variety over a field of positive characteristic is semi-ample if and only if its restriction to the exceptional locus (i.e. the union of subvarieties $Z$ such that $L|_Z$ is not big) is semi-ample. This criterion is not true in characteristic $0$.

share|improve this answer
1  
No : it is true as it stands. However, over $\overline{F}_p$, it is possible to deduce a statement that is very easy to apply in practice. You need only to check that the restriction of $L$ to the exceptional locus is numerically trivial (because, over $\overline{F}_p$ it implies that it is torsion, hence semi-ample). –  Olivier Benoist Sep 9 '12 at 20:28
    
(deleted a mistaken comment) –  Artie Prendergast-Smith Sep 9 '12 at 21:18
5  
what is the policy regarding deleting things? sometimes it makes subsequent comments confusing I reckon. –  Jacob Bell Sep 9 '12 at 21:40
    
@Olivier Is it true as it stands that it is not true? –  Wilberd van der Kallen Sep 10 '12 at 12:11
2  
@Wilberd Yes it is. In a deleted comment, Artie was wondering whether it was true over any field of positive characteristic or only over $\overline{F}_p$. My comment above was answering this question. –  Olivier Benoist Sep 10 '12 at 12:29
show 1 more comment

One other example: in characteristic $p>0$ there exist non trivial embeddings of the affine line $\mathbb{A}^1$ into the affine plane $\mathbb{A}^2$ (i.e. embeddings that are not equal to the composition of $x\mapsto (x,0)$ with an automorphism of $\mathbb{A}^2$). For example,

$x\mapsto (x^{p^2},x^{p^2+p}+x)$

is an embbeding because $k[x^{p^2},x^{p^2+p}+x]=k[x]$ (take $f=x^{p^2}$ and $g=x^{p^2+p}+x$, then $g^p-f^{p+1}=x^p$). It is not trivial because the degree of one component does not divide the other one.

In characteristic zero, there is no non-trivial embedding of $\mathbb{A}^1$ into $\mathbb{A}^2$. This is the famous Abhyankar-Moh theorem (Abhyankar, S.; Moh, T. T., Embeddings of the line in the plane. J. Reine Angew. Math. 276 (1975), 148–166.)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Perhaps this is an example of the contrapositive of a statement in char 0 that fails in all positive characteristics. The affine line has nontrivial \'etale covers over every field of positive characteristic, yet it is algebraically simply connected in characteristic $0$.

share|improve this answer
2  
In the same spirit: Kedlaya proved in 2004 that over any field $k$ of positive characteristic, any geometrically reduced purely $n$-dimensional projective variety is a finite cover of $\mathbb P^n_k$, étale away from a hyperplane. This is false in characteristic $0$ because the affine space is simply connected. –  Qing Liu Sep 11 '12 at 8:05
    
In fact, in positive characteristic, any irreducible affine variety of positive dimension has non-trivial étale cover. See mathoverflow.net/questions/16047 –  Qing Liu Sep 11 '12 at 12:24
add comment

Tamagawa has shown that a smooth curve (of genus $\neq 1$) over $\bar{\mathbb{F}}_p$ is determined by its profinite $\pi_1$ up to finite indeterminacy, that is, that the map $$\pi_1: M_{g,n}(\bar{\mathbb{F}}_p )\longrightarrow \mbox{Profinite groups up to isomorphism}$$ is finite-to-one. This is clearly false over, say, $\bar{\mathbb{Q}}$. It's not correct to conclude therefore that there are just fewer curves in characteristic $p$, in some sense. The truth is that $\pi_1$ simply retains more geometric information.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Here is a paper by Rachel Pries and Katherine Stevenson that addresses the question:

http://www.math.colostate.edu/~pries/Preprints/11dgroupreportv036.pdf

Full reference: Pries, R. and Stevenson, K. "A survey of Galois theory of curves in characteristic p" , Fields Institute Communications 60 , American Mathematical Society, Providence RI, (2011), 169-191.

I am not well-versed in this area, but I found this paper quite readable. Some of the examples in the paper (particularly the first half of the paper) have been brought up in answers already in this thread.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The stack $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$ of Deligne-Mumford stable curves and its coarse moduli space $\overline{M}_{g,n}$ are defined over $\mathbb{Z}$. Therefore they are defined over any commutative ring and in any characteristic.

Let $\pi:\mathcal{U}\rightarrow\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$ be the universal curve, $\omega_{\pi}$ the relative dualizing sheaf and $\Sigma$ the union of the sections of $\pi$. Then $\mathcal{L}:=\pi_{*}\omega_{\pi}(\Sigma)$ is a line bundle on $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$.

If $p:\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}\rightarrow\overline{M}_{g,n}$ is the coarse moduli space then $p_{*}\mathcal{L}$ is semi-ample in positive characteristic but this fails in characteristic zero.

See http://arxiv.org/abs/math/9901149.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.