Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does anyone know of any interesting examples of an infinite abelian $p$-group which is uncountable?

By non-interesting here I mean the direct sums of cylic and quasi-cylic groups, and totally projective groups. (The class of totally projective $p$-groups is the smallest class of abelian groups which contains the cyclic group of order $p$, is closed under taking direct sums and summands, and contains a group A if and only if it contains, for every ordinal $x$, both $p^{x}A$ and $A/p^{x}A$. It contains all countable abelian $p$-groups, and all groups in this class can be described by a recursive construction.)

The only example outside of these I know is the torsion subgroup of an unrestricted Cartesian product of cylic groups. Does anyone know of any others?

share|improve this question
2  
Community wiki? Since there might not be a definitive answer, and you seem to want a list. My own answer would be: ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Pr%C3%BCfer+group –  Todd Trimble Sep 6 '12 at 11:53
    
Sorry, I missed "uncountable". –  Todd Trimble Sep 6 '12 at 13:15
    
Todd, the Prufer group is also known as the quasicyclic group. I mention it in the second sentence It's also countable. Any divisible $p$-group is a direct sum of copies of this group. As any divisible subgroup of an abelian group is a direct summand, my question is only really about reduced groups, those with trivial maximal divisible subgroup. I don't want to make this community-wiki yet. I'm sort of looking for a list, but I am not sure if any examples other than the ones I mention are known. –  Jonathan Kiehlmann Sep 6 '12 at 13:18
1  
For fixed prime p, the torsion subgroup of $\prod\mathbf{Z}_{p^n}$ is an uncountable abelian p-group all of whose Ulm invariants are equal to 1; it is not isomorphic to a direct sum of cyclic groups (if it were, then the Ulm invariants would guarantee that it equals the direct sum of the $\mathbf{Z}_{p^n}$, which it plainly does not). It is also not a direct sum of indecomposable gruops. (Exercise 10.37 in Rotman's "Introduction to the Theory of Groups" 4th edition, though the text before the exercises incorrectly directs the reader to exercise 10.39). –  Arturo Magidin Sep 6 '12 at 15:10
    
@Arturo Magidin: I assume this group is what OP meant in the penultimate sentence of the question. –  quid Sep 6 '12 at 15:12

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.