MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If the following is true, it is probably well-known to the experts. Nevertheless, I could not find a reference for it.

Suppose $P$ and $Q$ are $A_{\infty}$-operads in topological spaces and $X$ is a $P$-algebra as well as a $Q$-algebra. Moreover, assume that the actions of $P$ and $Q$ on $X$ commute, i.e. the following diagram is strictly commutative:

$$ \begin{gather} Q(n) \times P(m) \times X^{nm} & \to & Q(n) \times X^n \\\\ \downarrow & & \downarrow \\\\ P(m) \times X^m & \to & X \end{gather} $$

where the upper horizontal arrow uses the "diagonal action" of $P$ on $X^n$ and likewise for the left vertical arrow. Now I can deloop with respect to the operad $P$ to obtain $B_PX$, similarly I can obtain $B_QX$, where I either use the delooping machine of Boardman and Vogt or the bar construction - your choice.

Is it true that $B_PX$ carries an action of the operad $Q$ in this case?

Somehow this question boils down to the problem, how well products are respected by the common delooping machines. For example, I know that $B(G_1 \times G_2)$ is homeomorphic to $BG_1 \times BG_2$ for groups (or monoids). Is this still true, if $G_i$ are just $A_{\infty}$-spaces?

share|cite|improve this question
Ulrich, did you mean $X^{nm}$ instead of $X^{n+m}$? – Todd Trimble Sep 3 '12 at 15:20
@Todd: Yes, I did. I corrected it. I had the case $n = m = 2$ in mind :-). – Ulrich Pennig Sep 3 '12 at 15:24

Something very close to this and quite possibly relevant occurs in the theory of $E_{\infty}$ ring spaces. There is a notion of an action of an operad $Q$ on an operad $P$. When $Q$ acts on $P$, the monad on the category of spaces associated to the operad $P$ restricts to a monad on the category of $Q$-spaces. This is an instance of a general distributivity theory of one monad acting on another due to Beck. The algebras over this monad give a version of your hypotheses on $X$. Adapting to the context of $A_{\infty}$ operads, and crossing $P$ with the little $1$-cubes operad (for example) without change of notation, there is a resulting delooping $B(\Sigma,P,X)$ that is a $Q$-space. The details are an adaptation of those in Sections 1, 4, 8, 9 and Appendix $A$ of my paper "What precisely are $E_{\infty}$ ring spaces and $E_{\infty}$ ring spectra''. Geometry \& Topology Monographs 16(2009), 215--282. I hope that is relevant and apologize if it is not.

Alternatively, there is a theory of tensor product of operads due to Boardman (and Vogt?) that might be relevant. I don't have the reference on the top of my head.

share|cite|improve this answer

First of all let me mention that the structure you describe is precisely the Boardman-Vogt tensor product of the operads $P$ and $Q$. I'll denote this by $P\otimes_{BV}Q$. A space is an algebra for the BV tensor product of $P$ and $Q$ if it is a $P$-algebra in the symmetric monoidal category of $Q$-algebras (note that you need the fact that the monoidal structure is the cartesian product to show that the category of $Q$-algebras in spaces is symmetric monoidal).

I don't have an answer to your exact question but here is something close to what you ask. Maybe you are aware of all this. If so I apologize :

The category of $P$-algebras in $Q$-algebras is Quillen equivalent to the category of $Ass$-algebras in $Q$-algebras by standard facts about category of algebras over operads. Therefore you can strictify your $P$-algebra structure. You get a space $X'$ which is homotopy equivalent to $X$ with an action of $Ass\otimes_{BV} Q$. To this you can apply the Bar construction. The important fact is that it doesn't matter if you do it in the category of spaces or in the category of $Q$-algebras because the forgetful functor $Q-Alg\to Spaces$ commutes with geometric realization of simplicial objects.

If you are careful about doing everything homotopically, you are going to end up with a space $Y$ which is weakly equivalent to $B_PX$ and which is equipped with a $Q$-action.

The following paper does something similar to show that $THH$ of an $E_2$-algebra is an $A_{\infty}$-algebra.

Something interesting is that you can only strictify one of the two $A_{\infty}$-structure. Indeed $P\otimes_{BV} Q$ is usually equivalent to the little $2$-disk operad (in fact the derived BV tensor product is equivalent to $E_2$). However $Ass\otimes Ass$ is the commutative operad. This paper talks about the BV tensor product of $A_\infty$ and $E_n$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.