MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Hi all,

I apologize if this question is too low level for mathoverflow. I'm happy to move it to math.stackexchange if so.

Let $X$ be a closed manifold, let $k$ be a nonnegative integer and let $C^k(X)$ denote the space of $k$-times continuously differentiable functions equipped with the $C^k$ norm.

Is $C^{k+1}(X)$ compactly contained in $C^k(X)$? Does this follow from Arzela-Ascoli?


share|cite|improve this question
Yes. Please move it to MSE. – timur Sep 1 '12 at 1:23
Thanks! Will do. Do you have a reference for this? – trex Sep 1 '12 at 2:26

The answer depends on what you mean by a closed manifold and a compact operator. If the manifold is compact without boundary then the spaces involved are Banach spaces and the answer is yes and this is indeed proved using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, after a standard localisation argument.

If the manifold is without boundary but not compact (think real line), then the spaces are Frechet spaces and the answer depends on what you mean by a compact operator on a locally convex space. If you define these as taking bounded sets into relatively compact ones, then the answer is yes, but if you mean those which take a neighbourhood of zero to a relativeley compact set (the usual definition), then the answer is no.

share|cite|improve this answer
I don't think the name "closed manifold" is ambiguous at all, in all the paper and books I read it always meant "compact without boundary". Wikipedia also agrees with me: – YangMills Sep 1 '12 at 18:29
I certainly meant compact without boundary. – trex Sep 2 '12 at 1:37

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.