2

Let for every $i=1,\dots,n$ and $j=1,\dots,n$ be given functions $a^{ij}\colon\mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$, $b^{i}\colon\mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$, $c\colon\mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$ from space $C^\infty_b(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R})$ of all bounded real functions on $\mathbb{R}^n$, having bounded derivatives of all orders. Let me define differential operator $L$ by equality

$$(Lu)(x)=\sum_{i=1}^n\sum_{j=1}^na^{ij}(x) \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_i\partial x_j}u(x) + \sum_{i=1}^nb^i(x)\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}u(x)+c(x)u(x).$$

Let's assume that exists constant $\varkappa>0$, such that for $\xi=(\xi_1,\dots,\xi_n)\in\mathbb{R}^n$ and all $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$ ellipticity condition holds: $\sum_{i=1}^n\sum_{j=1}^na^{ij}(x)\xi_i\xi_j\geq\varkappa\|\xi\|^2.$ Let's also assume that $c(x)\leq 0$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$.

Let constant $\lambda>0$ be fixed.

Let function $\psi\in C^\infty_b(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R})$ be also fixed, and $f$ be a solution (it exists and is unique in a class $C^\infty_b(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R})$) of an equation $$Lf-\lambda f=\psi.$$


QUESTION. What can we say about uniform upper estimate for derivatives of $f$, i.e. for $\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}^n}|\nabla f(x)|$ и $\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}^n}\left|\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_i\partial x_j} f(x)\right|?$ We can use in estimates $\lambda, \varkappa$ and all derivatives of $\psi$. Also in estimating we can use maximum of absolute values of coefficients of operator $L$, but not their derivatives.


I know, for instance, that $\|Lf-\lambda f\|\geq \lambda\|f\|$, and thus on the strength of equation $\|f\|\leq \frac{1}{\lambda}\|\psi\|$. But what can we say about derivatives of $f$?

It will be ideal if you post link for an article or a book in which the estimate is proven.

I have already looked in books by Krylov, by Ladyzhenskaya and Uraltseva, and by Gilbarg and Trudinger, but found only estimates in Holder spaces involving Holder norm of coefficients of $L$, which is not helpful because I can control only maximum of absolute values of coefficients of $L$.

I also heard something about de Giorgi estimates, but I don't know what are they.

Thank you in advance!

flag
Did you say the coefficients of $L$ have bounded derivatives of all order? This should be enough to get bounded Hölder norms. – timur Aug 13 at 17:00
timur, he wants a bound that depends only on the sup norm of the coefficients. I know of no estimate like that. – Deane Yang Aug 13 at 19:29
@Deane: Thanks, I see now. – timur Aug 13 at 22:01
First of all, thank you all guys for your interest to my question. – Ivan Remizov Aug 14 at 19:16
timur, all derivatives of coefficients of L are indeed bounded. But in my work I cannot control them, I just know that they are bounded. I only can control absolute values of the coefficients. But I have full freedom with respect to psi --- it is fixed, and I can include any derivative of psi to my estimate. – Ivan Remizov Aug 14 at 19:17
show 2 more comments

1 Answer

1

In 2 dimensions, Taylor's PDE III (Theorem 16.1) gives an interior estimate of the type you are seeking on $C^{1,\mu}$-norm of the solution. The result is due to Morrey. Taylor mentions that this is stronger than DeGiorgi-Nash-Moser estimates, which work for higher dimensions and give only a $C^{0,\mu}$-bound. I don't know if DeGiorgi-Nash-Moser can somehow be massaged to produce the desired estimates, at least in some special circumstances.

link|flag
I have n dimensions, this is important. It is impossible to reduce the situation to 2 dimensions. Where I can learn about DeGiorgi estimates? I do not know what is it. – Ivan Remizov Aug 14 at 19:15
1 
@Ivan: You can learn it in, for instance, Gilbarg-Trudinger, Giaquinta's Multiple integrals ..., Taylor's PDE III, Wu-Yin-Wang's Elliptic and parabolic ..., and Jost's PDE. – timur Aug 14 at 20:33

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.