Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $L$ be a lattice associate to the Dykin matrix of type $E_{8}$. I would like to understand involutions of $L$ and their invariant $L^{+}$ and coinvariant lattice $L^-$ (I think they are isomorphic). I am sure that this has been studied in some literature. I would appreciate it if anyone could let me know the classification or some reference.

Any comments are welcome.

share|cite|improve this question
The isometry group of the $E_8$ lattice is the same as the $E_8$ Weyl group (a fact that doesn't always hold for other weight lattices). So you're asking for conjugacy classes of order two elements in the $E_8$ Weyl group. Have you tried looking into the atlas of simple groups? – André Henriques Aug 11 '12 at 22:30
Not necessarily isomorphic; not even necessarily the same rank, e.g. reflection about a root has $L^+ \cong E_7$ and $L^- \cong A_1$ (and even more trivially central reflection has $L^+ = \lbrace 0 \rbrace$ and $L^- = E_8$). But it is possible for both $L^+$ and $L^-$ to be isomorphic with $D_4$. – Noam D. Elkies Aug 12 '12 at 2:34

2 Answers 2

As André already pointed out, it is sufficient to study the Weyl group $E_8$, looking in the atlas certainly works, see b).

a) BUT the Weyl group perspective makes it in my opinion enough accessible and explicit by hand:

For any involution $f$ of the root system you may proceed as for classifying Satake diagrams (just not pose the additional conditions which are in place there):

  • There exists a chamber $R^+$ (so: up to conjugation in the Weyl group) such that the number of roots transported out of $R^+$ is minimal.
  • An easy exercise shows that then $f=-id$ on these roots. The subset $S$ of simple roots $\alpha_1,....,\alpha_8$ with $f(\alpha_i)$ will be your first invariant of $f$ and determines $L_-$. Bear in mind that many parabolics $S$ are Weyl conjugate
  • Another easy exercise shows that in the quotient vector space by the previous guys $f$ acts just by permuting the remaining simple roots $\bar{S}$. This permutation $\pi$ of the sub-diagram $\bar{S}$ will be your second invariant from which you can somehow determine $L_+$ (careful, the permutation is only up to $S$). In particular if $\pi$ is trivial it will look like a restriction of the hyperplane-arrangement, those can be easily written down in terms of roots (yes, even for $E_8$ by hand, just takes a while, done it once!)

Bear in mind that I do not claim that all pairs $\{1...8\}=S\cup \bar{S},\pi$ can be realized (but I'd think so?)


  • Conjugacy class of reflections is $S=\{i\}$ for any $i$.
  • Conjugacy class of central involution $-1$ is $S=\{1...8\}$.
  • Is Noam's favourite choice (see c) $L_+=L_-=D_4$ the one with $S=D_4\subset E_8,\pi=id$ ?

b) Different approach to just look up what you want, maybe compare: By a remarkable coincidence it is a bicyclic extension of the Chevalley group of type $D_4$ over the field with two elements.


In particular the central involution $-1$ is visible. You indeed find $D_4(2)=O_8^+(2)$ in the atlas but I don't have it at hand right now.

c) As Noam pointed out there is indeed a class of involutions where both invariants and coinvariants are $D_4$. He was too humble to link to his previous post where he gives different explicit descriptions of this involutions, so I will fill in this gap: A question on an involution of $E_8$ lattice

Hope that helps, Simon

share|cite|improve this answer

In order to understand $E_8$, it is useful to have many different perspectives. Here are some ways of writing its eight simple roots $\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_8$ in various coordinate systems. I'll also list the lowest root $\alpha_0=−2\alpha_1 -3\alpha_2 -4\alpha_3 -5\alpha_4 -6\alpha_5 -4\alpha_6 -2\alpha_7 -3\alpha_8$ in those same coordinates.

Description 1: $$ \begin{matrix} \alpha_0&=& (1,-1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_1&=& (0,1,−1,0,0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_2&=& (0,0,1,−1,0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_3&=& (0,0,0,1,−1,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_4&=& (0,0,0,0,1,−1,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_5&=& (0,0,0,0,0,1,−1,0,0)\\ \alpha_6&=& (0,0,0,0,0,0,1,−1,0)\\ \alpha_7&=& (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,−1)\\ \alpha_8&=& -\tfrac13( 1,1,1,1,1,1,−2,−2,−2)\,\,\,\, \end{matrix} $$

Description 2: $$ \begin{matrix} \alpha_0&=& (1,-1,0,0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_1&=& (0,1,−1,0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_2&=& (0,0,1,−1,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_3&=& (0,0,0,1,−1,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_4&=& (0,0,0,0,1,−1,0,0)\\ \alpha_5&=& (0,0,0,0,0,1,−1,0)\\ \alpha_6&=& (0,0,0,0,0,0,1,−1)\\ \alpha_7&=&-\tfrac12(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,-1)\,\,\,\,\\ \alpha_8&=& (0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1) \end{matrix} $$

Description 3: $$ \begin{matrix} \alpha_0&=& (1,-1,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_1&=& (0,1,−1,0,0)\oplus(0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_2&=& (0,0,1,−1,0)\oplus(0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_3&=& (0,0,0,1,−1)\oplus(0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_4&=& -\tfrac15[(1,1,1,1,−4)\oplus(3,3,−2,−2,−2)]\,\,\,\,\\ \alpha_5&=& (0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,1,-1,0,0)\\ \alpha_6&=& (0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0,1,-1,0)\\ \alpha_7&=& (0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0,0,1,-1)\\ \alpha_8&=& (0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(1,-1,0,0,0) \end{matrix} $$

Description 4: $$ \begin{matrix} \alpha_0&=& (1,-1,0,0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_1&=& (0,1,-1,0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_2&=& (0,0,1,-1,0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_3&=& (0,0,0,1,-1,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_4&=& (0,0,0,0,1,-1,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_5&=& (0,0,0,0,0,1,-1,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_6&=& -\tfrac14[(1,1,1,1,1,1,−3,−3)\oplus(2,−2)]\,\,\,\,\\ \alpha_7&=& (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(1,-1)\\ \alpha_8&=& (0,0,0,0,0,0,1,-1)\oplus(0,0) \end{matrix} $$

Description 5: $$ \begin{matrix} \alpha_0&=& (1,-1,0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_1&=& (0,1,-1,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_2&=& (0,0,1,-1,0,0)\oplus(0,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_3&=& (0,0,0,1,-1,0)\oplus(0,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_4&=& (0,0,0,0,1,-1)\oplus(0,0,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_5&=& -\tfrac16[(1,1,1,1,1,−5)\oplus(4,−2,−2)\oplus(3,−3)]\\ \alpha_6&=& (0,0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(1,-1,0)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_7&=& (0,0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,1,-1)\oplus(0,0)\\ \alpha_8&=& (0,0,0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0,0)\oplus(1,-1) \end{matrix} $$

Description 6: $$ \begin{matrix} \alpha_0&=& (1,-1,0,0)\oplus(0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_1&=& (0,1,-1,0)\oplus(0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_2&=& (0,0,1,-1)\oplus(0,0,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_3&=& -\tfrac14[(1,1,1,−3)\oplus(2,−2,−2,−2,−2)]\\ \alpha_4&=& (0,0,0,0)\oplus(1,-1,0,0,0)\\ \alpha_5&=& (0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,1,-1,0,0)\\ \alpha_6&=& (0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0,1,-1,0)\\ \alpha_7&=& (0,0,0,0)\oplus(0,0,0,1,-1)\\ \alpha_8&=& (0,0,0,0)\oplus(-1,-1,0,0,0) \end{matrix} $$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.