# product operation: name and notation

For every product in a category, there exists an operation $\langle\cdot, \cdot\rangle$ that turns morphisms $f : C \to A$ and $g : C \to B$ into morphisms $\langle f, g\rangle : C \to A \times B$. How are this operation and its results usually called? Calling $\langle f, g\rangle$ the product of $f$ and $g$ does not make sense to me, since I would expect $f \times g$ to be the product of the two morphisms.

Furthermore there is the generalisation of binary products in the form of arbitrary products $\prod_{i \in I} A_i$ for families $\{A_i\}_{i \in I}$ of objects. These products have, of course, variants of the $\langle\cdot, \cdot\rangle$-operator. What is the usual notation for these variants? So far, I wrote $\langle\{f_i\}_{i \in I}\rangle : C \to \prod_{i \in I} A_i$ for families of morphisms $f_i : C \to A_i$. Is this standard?

-
Maybe $f \times_C g$? – Qiaochu Yuan Aug 11 '12 at 17:43

Probably $\langle f, g\rangle : C \to A \times B$ is most often just called the arrow to the product. You are right it should not be called a product arrow. People who want a specific name for the operation have called it the "pairing arrow."
I would write $\langle f_i\rangle_{i \in I} : C \to \prod_{i \in I} A_i$ without curly brackets in the angle brackets and i would call it the arrow to the product. A more specific name for the operation could be "tupling arrow."
+1 for the "pairing" of $f$ and $g$; I think this is the most common term and the most sensible. I've seen it written $(f,g)$ as well as $\langle f,g\rangle$; either seems fine to me. – Mike Shulman Aug 13 '12 at 6:02
By the way, how would you call the corresponding operaton $[\cdot, \cdot]$ for coproducts then? – Wolfgang Jeltsch Aug 13 '12 at 8:30
@Colin: The notation $\langle f_i\rangle_{i \in I}$ looks nice and sensible indeed. – Wolfgang Jeltsch Aug 13 '12 at 8:31