MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\mathcal{C}$ a category.

Let $Fib(\mathcal{C})$ the category of fibrations (on $\mathcal{C}$) with morphisms the cartesian functors $T: (\mathcal{A}, P)\to (\mathcal{B}, Q)$

i.e. $T: \mathcal{A}\to \mathcal{B}$ with $Q\circ T=P$ (where $P: \mathcal{A}\to \mathcal{C}$, $P: \mathcal{B}\to \mathcal{C}$ are fibrations on $\mathcal{C}$).

From literature (es. "Categorical logic and Type THeory" B.Jacobs) the pullbak of two fibration (i.e. the product in $Fib(\mathcal{C})$) is still a fibration, and this has a easy generalization to a multi-pullback i.e. a the inclusion $Fib(\mathcal{C})\subset CAT\downarrow \mathcal{C}$ create (small) product, the some is true for the kernel of a couple, then the inclusion above create all (small) limits. THe some is easly true for coproducts.

I ask: do the inclusion $Fib(\mathcal{C})\subset CAT\downarrow \mathcal{C}$ create also cokernels? Counterexamples?.

Observation $Fib(\mathcal{C})$ is equivalent to the category of pseudo-functors $P: \mathcal{C}^{op}\to CAT$ with pseudo-transformations as morphisms, and the punctual limits or colimits of pseudofunctors is still a pseudofuntors (I seems yes, anyway this is true for funtors and natural tranformations considering the category $sFib(\mathcal{C})$ of fibrations with split clevages and clevage preserving functors ), then $Fib(\mathcal{C})$ (or at least $sFib(\mathcal{C})$) is complete and cocomplete.

share|cite|improve this question

$\mathrm{Fib}(\mathcal{C})$ is both monadic and comonadic over $\mathrm{Cat}/\mathcal{C}$, in the pseudo sense. That is, there are a monad $T$ and a comonad $G$ on $\mathrm{Cat}/\mathcal{C}$ such that $\mathrm{Fib}(\mathcal{C})$ is equivalent to the 2-category of strict $T$-algebras and pseudo $T$-morphisms, and also to the 2-category of strict $G$-coalgebras and pseudo $G$-morphisms. By definition $T$ is the span-composite with $\mathcal{C} \leftarrow \mathcal{C}^{\mathbf{2}} \to \mathcal{C}$, while $G$ is its right adjoint.

Therefore, by a theorem of Blackwell-Kelly-Power and its dual, the forgetful functor creates strict PIE-limits and strict PIE-colimits, hence also (weak) 2-limits and 2-colimits.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much. I guess you first answere is from the R. Street article on Sydney category seminar (LNm 420). WHere I can find references about Blackwell-Kelly-Power theorem? – Buschi Sergio Aug 6 '12 at 21:13
The first observation is made in multiple places, another one is Street's "Fibrations in bicategories". The Blackwell-Kelly-Power paper is "Two-dimensional monad theory". – Mike Shulman Aug 7 '12 at 6:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.