Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the "no small subgroups" argument for $GL(n,\mathbb R)$? That is, how do we show that in $GL(n,\mathbb R)$ there exists a neighborhood of the identity which contains no subgroup other than the trivial one? I had some scribbling (for the $n=2$ case) but could not arrive at a clean proof.

share|improve this question
6  
Just use the fact exponential map from the Lie algebra to the group is diffeomorphism on small neighbourhood of the identity and that $g^{k}=exp(k\cdot x)$ for some $x$ in the Lie algebra... –  Asaf Aug 2 '12 at 15:21
    
@Asaf: I do not see how this suffices without more work. Can you fill in the rest of your argument? –  Qiaochu Yuan Aug 3 '12 at 17:16

2 Answers 2

up vote 11 down vote accepted

Here is Asaf's agrument expanded a bit. It has the advantage of working for all Lie groups simultaneously.

Given a Lie group $G$ with Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, consider the exponential map $\exp:\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow G$. It is known that it is a diffeomorphism on a small enough open set $U\subseteq\mathfrak{g}$.

Choosing an inner product on $\mathfrak{g}$, we may assume wlog that $U$ has the form $U = \{v\in \mathfrak{g} : \; |v| < \epsilon\}$ for some $\epsilon > 0$. Let $V\subseteq U$ with $V = \{v\in\mathfrak{g} : \; |v| < \epsilon/2\}$.

I claim that $\exp(V)$ contains no nontrivial subgroups. Indeed, suppose $H\subseteq \exp(V)$ is a subgroup and choose $g\in H$ so $g = \exp(v)$ for some $v\in V$. I claim that $2v \in V$ as well. To see this, notice that since $g^2 \in H\subseteq \exp(V)$, we must have $g^2 = \exp(w)$ for some $w\in V$. Then $\exp(w) = g^2 = \exp(v)^2 = \exp(2v)$ which implies $w=2v$ since $\exp|_U$ is a diffeomorphism. Thus, $2v \in V$.

But now can iterate this argument showing $2^n v \in V$ for all $n$. Since $|2^n v| = 2^n |v|$, this implies $v=0$, i.e. that $g =e$ so $H$ is trivial.

share|improve this answer
    
A typo: you are to claim that $2v\in V$, not $2v\in \exp(V)$. –  Murat Güngör Aug 4 '12 at 12:14
    
Murat: Thank you, it's fixed now. –  Jason DeVito Aug 4 '12 at 16:12

It suffices to show that the powers of some non-identity element $g \in \text{GL}_n(\mathbb{R})$ near the identity "escape from the identity." If $g$ has an eigenvalue not equal to $1$ then this follows by examining eigenvalues (we should take a neighborhood of the identity containing only elements with eigenvalues very close to $1$), so we reduce to the case that $g$ is unipotent. But now we can just compute that $|1 - g^k|$ tends to $\infty$ in, say, Hilbert-Schmidt norm by writing $g$ as an upper-triangular matrix.

Edit: To show that a neighborhood containing elements with eigenvalues very close to $1$ exists, consider the neighborhood of elements whose characteristic polynomial is close to $(\lambda - 1)^n$ (we will be more precise about this). Write $z = \lambda - 1$, so we are trying to show that a polynomial of the form

$$z^n = a_{n-1} z^{n-1} + ... + a_0$$

has small roots if the $a_i$ are chosen to be small. Writing this as $1 = \frac{a_{n-1}}{z} + ... + \frac{a_0}{z^n}$ we have

$$1 \le (|a_{n-1}| + ... + |a_0|) \text{max} \left( \frac{1}{|z|}, \frac{1}{|z|^n} \right)$$

by the triangle inequality. We conclude that if we stipulate $|a_{n-1}| + ... + |a_0| < \text{min}(\epsilon, \epsilon^n)$ then $|z| < \epsilon$.

share|improve this answer
1  
Alternately, the closure of a small subgroup is compact, and a compact subgroup can be conjugated into $\text{O}(n)$ so has no unipotent elements. But this requires the existence of Haar measure... –  Qiaochu Yuan Aug 2 '12 at 14:36
    
Still alternatively, every nontrivial subgroup of $O(n)$ with compact closure has an element whose trace is at most $n-3/2$ (indeed, take a nonidentity element, take some power having eigenvalue $e^{ix}$ with $x\in [2\pi/3,4\pi/3]$). –  YCor Aug 2 '12 at 17:25
    
Qiaochu, you say that 1 has a neighborhood consisting of matrices having eigenvalues close to 1; do you have a simple proof of this? –  Murat Güngör Aug 3 '12 at 14:57
    
@Murat: I have edited in a proof. –  Qiaochu Yuan Aug 3 '12 at 15:59
    
@Murat, by the implicit function theorem, the roots of a perturbed polynomial are close to the roots of the original polynomial before the perturbation, and by the definition of the coefficients of the char. polynomial as an algebraic maps (hence continuous) you get that close matrices has close char. polynomials (but not as an effective statement as Qiaochu shown). –  Asaf Aug 4 '12 at 17:28

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.