MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It seems to me that Picard stacks as defined by Deligne and used in algebraic geometry are stacks of symmetric monoidal categories. Am I missing something? Is there a difference between the two notions? The Picard stack I am interested in shows up in symplectic toric geometry (arXiv:0908.2783v2[math.SG] )

share|cite|improve this question
    
The difference is obviously not in the stacky part, bur in the categorical part. A Picard category is a symmetric monomial category where all morphisms are invertible. – Fernando Muro Jul 26 '12 at 14:35
1  
Thanks. So a Picard category is a symmetric monoidal groupoid? – Eugene Lerman Jul 26 '12 at 15:43
2  
I think the point is that all objects are invertible (with respect to the monoidal structure). – Konrad Waldorf Jul 26 '12 at 18:43
1  
In modern terms, a Picard category is some flavour of 'abelian' 2-group. – David Roberts Jul 26 '12 at 22:25
1  
Konrad is correct, I missed objects, in a Picard groupoid objects and morphisms are invertible. – Fernando Muro Jul 27 '12 at 0:58

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.