MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Gromov's paper regarding this proof, he says that by taking the best possible $H$ , we can get the following result: Let $k>0 , x$ be such that $ 1-x \leq K \int_0^{\infty} J_{k,H} (t) dt $ and $ x \leq K \int_0^{\infty} J_{k,-H} (t) dt $ for some constant $K$ . He then says that this implies that $ K \geq \phi \circ \Phi^{-1}(x) $ , where:

$\phi(t) = \frac{sin^{n-1} ( \sqrt{k} t) }{\int_0^{\pi/\sqrt{k}}sin^{n-1} (\sqrt{k} s ) ds}$

$ \Phi(t)=\int_0 ^t \phi(s)ds $ , $J_{k,H} (t) = ( sLk ' (t) + \frac{H}{n-1} s_k(t) ) _+ ^{n-1} $ $ s_k(t) = \frac{sin(\sqrt{k} t ) }{\sqrt{k} } $ .

does someone have an idea about this conclusion? How did he deduce this fact?

thanks !

[http://www.ihes.fr/~gromov/PDF/11[33].pdf ]

share|cite|improve this question
3  
@Jeremy, do you think it might be possible to understand your question? (Better say what is the place in the paper your are trying to understand.) – Anton Petrunin Jul 24 '12 at 12:26
3  
Or at least provide more context for these constants, functions, and formulas. – Deane Yang Jul 24 '12 at 12:38
    
I really cannot find these formulas in the paper you quoted. What is the precise page number? – YangMills Jul 28 '12 at 16:00

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.