0

Suppose I have a r.v. $Z = X + \alpha Y$ and that $F_Z$ is the probability distribution function of $Z$. If we think of the probability $p = F_Z(q) = \mathbb{P}(X+\alpha Y < q)$ as a function $p = p(q, \alpha)$, how can we write the derivative $\partial_{\alpha} p(q, \alpha)$ supposing as much regularilty on the distribution of $X$ and $Y$ as we want?

I'm loosely thinking of a situation where you know the marginals distributions $F_X$ and $F_Y$ and maybe locally (around $(q, \alpha)$) know some information about the dependence of $X$ and $Y$ (maybe correlation is enough in some cases to build an approximation?).

flag
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_integral_rule – Douglas Zare Jul 20 at 23:51
I guess I should say I'm looking for something where you don't use the full joint distribution function. – mathtick Jul 22 at 1:24
1 
Then you're looking for something that doesn't exist. – Robert Israel Jul 22 at 7:46
1 
To see that correlation isn't enough, remember that adding outliers can affect the correlation coefficients with a negligible effect on probabilities like $P(X+\alpha Y \lt q)$. – Douglas Zare Jul 22 at 9:44

1 Answer

2

If $X$ and $Y$ have joint density $f(x,y)$, we have $p(q,\alpha) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty dy\ \int_{-\infty}^{q - \alpha y} dx\ f(x,y)$ and thus (assuming sufficient regularity) $\partial_\alpha p(q,\alpha) = - \int_{-\infty}^\infty dy \ y f(q-\alpha y,y)$.

link|flag
The appendix here is useful: efinance.org.cn/cn/FEshuo/… – mathtick Aug 7 at 18:56
... and in case the internet changes by the time you read the previous comment the reference is: Sensitivity analysis of Values at Risk, C. Gourieroux, J.P. Laurent, O. Scaille – mathtick Aug 7 at 19:43

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.