MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $n,m \geq 1$ be such that the topological spaces $\mathbb{Q}_p^n$ and $\mathbb{Q}_p^m$ are homeomorphic. Can we conclude $n=m$?

For $\mathbb{Z}_p$ it's false: In fact, Brouwer's theorem implies that $\mathbb{Z}_p$ is homeomorphic to the Cantor set $C$, which of course satisfies $C^n \cong C^m$ for all $n,m$.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

$\mathbb{Q}_p$ is homeomorphic to a countable direct sum of copies of the Cantor set $C$. Indeed, because the valuation is discrete, for each $n \geq 1$ the "annulus"

$A_n =$ {$x \in \mathbb{Q}_p \ | \ p^{n-1} < ||x|| \leq p^{n}$}

is closed and homeomorphic to the Cantor set $C$. (Take of course $A_0 = \mathbb{Z}_p$.)

Since as you observed above, $C \times C \cong C$, it follows that $\mathbb{Q}_p^n$ and $\mathbb{Q}_p^m$ are homeomorphic for all $m, \ n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$ (and the homeomorphism type is independent of $p$).

share|cite|improve this answer
A topologist would probably say "disjoint union" rather than "direct sum". – Gerald Edgar Dec 31 '09 at 15:19
That's true. So probably I'm not a topologist, then. (Seriously, the poster has shown great familiarity with categorical language and ideas, so I'm sure he understands the "direct sum" and would conjecture that he thinks of it that way himself.) – Pete L. Clark Jan 1 '10 at 10:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.