MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $K = \mathbb{F}_q(C)$ be a global function field of an irreducible projective and smooth curve $C$ defined over a finite field of constants $\mathbb{F}_q$. Let $T$ be a $K$-torus. We choose one closed point $\infty$ to be the point at infinity, and consider the ring of $\{\infty\}$-integers of $K$, namely: $$ A_\infty = \{ a \in K : v_\frak{p}(a) \geq 0 \ \ \forall \frak{p} \neq \infty \}. $$ Then $T$ admits a global Néron-Raynaud model $\mathcal{T}$ defined over $\text{Spec}~A_\infty$, which is of finite type, obtained by glueing all local Néron-Raynaud models $\mathcal{T}_\frak{p}$ which are of finite type, defined each one over the corresponding local valuation ring $\mathcal{O}_p$. The glueing is along the generic fiber $T$. Denote by $\mathcal{T}_\frak{p}$ a connected reduction modulo $\frak{p}$. Let $\mathcal{T}^0$ denote the subscheme of $\mathcal{T}$ whose geometric fibers are $\mathcal{T}_\frak{p}^0$.

My question is can I express the finite index $[\mathcal{T}(A_\infty):\mathcal{T}^0(A_\infty)]$ as the product of $[\mathcal{T}_\frak{p}(\mathcal{O}_\frak{p}):\mathcal{T}_\frak{p}^0(\mathcal{O}_p)]$ (which may differ from 1 only if $\frak{p}$ is ramified on the minimal splitting field of $T$) running over all $\frak{p} \neq \infty$ ?

share|cite|improve this question

The direction to the following counterexample has been suggested to me by Prof. Liu, for whom I am grateful:

Suppose there are two distinct finite ramified primes $\frak{p}_1$ and $\frak{p}_2$ for which the corresponding geometric fibers have the same connected component. Then since $\mathcal{T}^0(A_\infty)$ is the intersection of all $\mathcal{T}^0_{\frak{p}}(\mathcal{O}_{\frak{p}})$, the resulting index maybe taken only once in the global scheme, while it may appear twice in the product of the local indices. So we have a divisiblity relation of course but not the equality necessarily.

Example: Let $K=\mathbb{F}_q(t)$ with odd characteristic and $L=K(\sqrt{\frak{p}_1 \cdot \frak{p}_2})$ where $\frak{p}_1$ and $\frak{p}_2$ are two distinct finite primes of degree $1$. Consider the corresponding norm torus: $$ T = Spec~K [x,y]/(x^2-{\frak{p}_1\frak{p}_2} y^2-1). $$ Then the reduction of both $\mathcal{T}^0_{\frak{p}_i}(\mathcal{O}_{\frak{p}_i})$ for $i=1,2$ is: $ \{ 1 + {\frak{p}_1 \frak{p}_2} y : y \in \mathbb{F}_q \}$. The $A_{\infty}$-scheme $\mathcal{T}$ obtained by the glueing process is not necessarily reductive as it may have (finitely many) fibers with a non-reductive reduction. An element in $T(K)$ having a proper pole at $\infty$ has a proper zero at some finite prime. But since: $$ \mathcal{T}(A_\infty) = T(K) \cap \prod_{\frak{p} \neq \infty} \mathcal{T}_{\frak{p}}(\mathcal{O}_{\frak{p}}), $$ this element has a proper pole at that prime, thus does not belong to $\mathcal{T}(A_\infty)$.
We may therefore conclude that $\mathcal{T}(A_\infty)$ consists only with elements which are regular everywhere, i.e. constants (as the curve is projective). In our case: $$ \mathcal{T}(A_{\infty}) = \mathcal{T}(\mathbb{F}_q) = \{x \in \mathbb{F}_q : x^2=1 \} = \{\pm 1\}. $$
So we get: $$ [\mathcal{T}(A_\infty):\mathcal{T}^0(A_\infty)] = 2 $$ while: $$ [\mathcal{T}_{\frak{p}_1}(\mathcal{O}_{\frak{p}_1}):\mathcal{T}_{\frak{p}_1}^0(\mathcal{O}_{\frak{p}_1})] \cdot [\mathcal{T}_{\frak{p}_2}(\mathcal{O}_{\frak{p}_2}):\mathcal{T}_{\frak{p}_2}^0(\mathcal{O}_{\frak{p}_2})] = 2 \cdot 2 =4. $$ Rony.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.