MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I may be missing an obvious example, but here goes...

Let $X$ denote a complex manifold of dimension $n$. If $X$ is Kähler, then the induced metric on any complex submanifold is also Kähler. If instead $X$ is non-Kähler, we can at least say that any coordinate neighborhood $(U,\varphi)$ inherits a Kähler metric from the induced Euclidean metric on an open subset of $\mathbb{C}^n$. If $X$ is already equipped with a metric, note that this metric on $U$ may not be compatible with it. However, I am unsure of what can be said about the metric structure of $U$ if instead we allow something a little more exotic. For example, what if we take $U$ to be the complement of an analytic set? This is the situation in which I am most interested.

My question is:

Is there an example of a non-Kähler manifold, $X$, and a Zariski open subset $U\subset X$, such that $U$ admits a Kähler metric?

Added: Francesco has provided a class of examples in dimensions $\geq 3$ and BS has provided an example in dimension 2 as a comment to Benoît's answer. I am going to write up BS's example, with a few minor additions, as an answer. In case he decides to write his own answer, I'll delete mine and encourage everyone to vote his up.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 15 down vote accepted

One can consider the following example.

A Moishezon manifold $M$ is a compact connected complex manifold such that the field of meromorphic functions on $M$ has transcendence degree equal to the complex dimension of $M$. Complex algebraic varieties have this property, but the converse is not true if the dimension is at least $3$.

In 1967, Boris Moishezon showed that a Moishezon manifold is a projective algebraic variety if and only if it admits a Kaehler metric. Now take a non-projective (hence non-Kaehler) Moishezon manifold $M$. One can prove that such a manifold admits a bimeromorphic modification $\pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M$ such that $\widetilde{M}$ is projective.

This implies that there exist an analytic subset $S \subset M$ such that $U:=M - S$ is biholomorphic to an open subset of a projective variety (one can take as $S$ a $1$-codimensional analytic subset).

Hence $U$ admits a Kaehler metric.

For further details see the paper by Shanyu Ji Currents, metrics and Moishezon manifolds, Pacific J. Math. Volume 158, Number 2 (1993), 335-351.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is a great answer! Thanks. – Kevin Jul 15 '12 at 0:47
Any chance you'd know where to look for an example in dimension 2? It seems the above construction breaks down there because all Moishezon surfaces are Kahler, by the Chow-Kodaira Theorem. – Kevin Jul 15 '12 at 1:38
You are welcome. Right, this construction cannot be applied in dimension $2$; one needs another idea. I should think about it. – Francesco Polizzi Jul 15 '12 at 8:05
More concretely, any smooth non-projective toric manifold is such an example. Use Chow's lemma you can find an open which is projective, so Kahler. – temp Aug 26 '12 at 18:58

This example is due to BS -- see the edit to the original question.

For an example in dimension two, consider the Hopf surface $X = \left(\mathbb{C}^2\setminus \{0\}\right)/\mathbb{Z}$, where $\mathbb{Z}$ acts as $n\cdot(x,y) = (2^nx,2^ny)$. One can show that $X$ is diffeomorphic to $S^3\times S^1$. It follows that $X$ is non-Kähler because $H^2(X,\mathbb{Z}) = 0$. The $\mathbb{Z}$ action restricts to an action on $\mathbb{C}^*$, which is identified with $\mathbb{C}^*\times \{0\}$, and the smooth curve $E = \mathbb{C}^*/\mathbb{Z}$ of genus 1 includes into $X$ as a submanifold. $Y = X\setminus E$ is then biholomorphic to $E\times \mathbb{C}$ via the map $[(x,y)]\rightarrow \left([y],x/y\right)$. Thus $Y$ admits a Kähler structure. In fact, $Y$ is a quasiprojective variety, as it is isomorphic to an open subset of $E\times \mathbb{P}^1$.

More generally, the Hopf manifolds $X_n = \left(\mathbb{C}^n\setminus \{0\}\right)/\mathbb{Z},\ \ n\geq 2$, are all non-Kähler, as $X_n\simeq S^{2n-1}\times S^1$. The identification $\mathbb{C}^{n-1}\simeq \mathbb{C}^{n-1}\times \{0\}\subset \mathbb{C}^n$ gives rise to an embedding $X_{n-1}\subset X_n$ and, by an argument identical to the one above, we get an isomorphism $Y_n = X_n\setminus X_{n-1} \simeq E\times \mathbb{C}^{n-1}$. Again, $Y_n\subset E\times \mathbb{P}^{n-1}$ is quasiprojective. This gives an example in every dimension $n\geq 2$.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is only a slight nitpick: "... and the smooth curve $E$ of genus 1 includes canonically into $X$". In fact $X$ is the total space of a family of elliptic curves $E$ (all isomorphic between them) over the projective line, so the inclusion of $E$ into $X$ is not very canonical (unless we can agree on one point of $\mathbb P^1$---a homogeneous manifold---being more canonical than all the others!). – Gunnar Þór Magnússon Jul 19 '12 at 4:46
Good point. I'll tone down the wording a bit. – Kevin Jul 19 '12 at 5:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.