MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Reading 2007 paper A tour of theta dualities on moduli spaces of sheaves by Alina Marian and Dragos Oprea.

Why is any moduli space of coherent sheaves on a K3 surface deformation equivalent to a moduli space of sheaves on an elliptic K3?

(The authors consider a space of "Gieseker H-semistable sheaves", if that is important)

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

This follows from a result of Yoshioka. In Theorem 8.1 of this paper Yoshioka showed that every moduli space of coherent sheaves on a K3 surface $X$ is deformation equivalent to an appropriate Hilbert scheme of points of $X$. Since every K3 is deformation equivalent to an elliptic K3 it follows that their Hilbert schemes are deformation equivalent and so you get the statement that you wanted.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.